These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21090543)

  • 1. MN: Did nurses fail to timely call for help?: Court reversed summary judgment for hospital. Kuhne v. Allina Health Systems, A-09-1826 MNCA(6/15/2010)-MN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Aug; 51(3):3. PubMed ID: 21090543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Did nurses goof-up in assessment & failure to call Dr.? Kuhne v. Allina Health Systems, A09-1826 MNCA (6/15/2010)-MN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Jul; 51(2):1. PubMed ID: 20726218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dr. fails to leave post-op. orders: nurses fail to timely call Dr. Case on point: Lupinacci v. Med. Center of Delaware, 2002 WL 31006263 N.E.2d. -DE (2002).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Sep; 43(4):2. PubMed ID: 12375397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Where were the nurses?
    Nursing; 2007 Oct; 37(10):59. PubMed ID: 17906556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Was fundal pressure by nurses during birth cause of brain damage? Case on point: Martinez v. Northridge Hospital Medical Ctr., 2003 WL 22234957-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Oct; 44(5):2. PubMed ID: 14621515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amputee's 'other leg' is injured by nurses & amputated.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Sep; 44(4):1. PubMed ID: 14564945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CA: Did RN fail to document or monitor i.v.?: Nonsuit for lack of Dr.'s testimony re causation. Galvez v. Loma Linda University Medical Center, E047803 CAAPP4-2 (5/6/2010)-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Aug; 51(3):3. PubMed ID: 21105314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure to follow dr.'s orders: post-op orthopedic pt. injured. Case on point: Redel v. Capital Region Medical Center, 2005 WL 1084105 S.W.3d--MO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 May; 45(12):4. PubMed ID: 15981978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reversible error results in new trial for RN. Case on point: Winter v. Henderson, A-215-10T3 NJSUP (2/22/2012)-NJ.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 May; 52(12):2. PubMed ID: 22679663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delivering the verdict.
    Nursing; 2003 Dec; 33(12):28. PubMed ID: 14708540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nurses fail to object to Dr.'s mid-forceps delivery. Daniels v Durham County Hospital Corp.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Sep; 46(4):2. PubMed ID: 16238174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pt. deteriorates-nurses fail to call dr.-death results. Doctors Hospital, Doctors Hospital, 1997, L.P.[sic] v. Hernandez, 01-10-00270-CV TXCA1 (10/21/2010)-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Dec; 51(7):1. PubMed ID: 21275328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal case briefs for nurses. MN: nursery unstaffed: brain damage; MI: brachial plexus palsy: jury instruction.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):3. PubMed ID: 3852350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses fail to monitor blood sugar despite family pleas.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Aug; 36(3):2. PubMed ID: 7480774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurses delay reporting paralysis: "Loss of Chance".
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Mar; 35(10):1. PubMed ID: 7724792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "discovery doctrine" in nursing malpractice.
    George JE; Quattrone MS
    J Emerg Nurs; 1993 Aug; 19(4):346-7. PubMed ID: 8350557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurse delays reporting sexual assault on patient. Case in point: K.L.v. Riverside Medical Center 524 N.W. 2d 300--MN (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Feb; 35(9):4. PubMed ID: 7701071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurses fail to respond to emergency "stat". Case in point: Garcia v. U.S. (697 F. Supp. 1579--CO (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jan; 29(8):4. PubMed ID: 2922484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court holds "charting by exception" policy negligent. Case in point: Lama v. Borras 16F. 2d 473 PR (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):2. PubMed ID: 7517052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LA: Judgment for defendants reversed: fact issues for jury precluded summary action. Gleason v. Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, 031010 LACA2,44,947-CA (3/19/2010)-LA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):3. PubMed ID: 20503498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.