603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21091017)
1. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression.
Artes PH; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Jampel HD; Singh K; Lin SC; Chen TC; Francis BA; Hodapp E; Samples JR; Smith SD
Ophthalmology; 2011 May; 118(5):986-1002. PubMed ID: 21539982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signal/noise ratios to compare tests for measuring visual field progression.
Ernest PJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6893; author reply 6893-4. PubMed ID: 21123778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standard automated perimetry and algorithms for monitoring glaucoma progression.
Scuderi GL; Cesareo M; Perdicchi A; Recupero SM
Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():77-99. PubMed ID: 18929103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship.
Anderson RS
Prog Retin Eye Res; 2006 Jan; 25(1):79-97. PubMed ID: 16081311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma.
Nouri-Mahdavi K
Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of the subjective determination of glaucomatous visual field progression.
Tanna AP; Bandi JR; Budenz DL; Feuer WJ; Feldman RM; Herndon LW; Rhee DJ; Whiteside-de Vos J
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jan; 118(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 20723992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What reduction in standard automated perimetry variability would improve the detection of visual field progression?
Turpin A; McKendrick AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 May; 52(6):3237-45. PubMed ID: 21357405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
Frisén L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpreting glaucoma progression by white-on-white perimetry.
Tan JC; Franks WA; Hitchings RA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 240(7):585-92. PubMed ID: 12136293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The groningen longitudinal glaucoma study III. The predictive value of frequency-doubling perimetry and GDx nerve fibre analyser test results for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Eye (Lond); 2009 Aug; 23(8):1647-52. PubMed ID: 19011607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
