BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21091017)

  • 21. Rates of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma measured by scanning laser polarimetry.
    Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Alencar LM; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 149(6):908-15. PubMed ID: 20378095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vision restoration training for glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sabel BA; Gudlin J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 132(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 24504128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
    Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short-wavelength automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous standard visual field loss by ten years.
    Sit AJ; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2004; 19(3-4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15590553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
    Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
    Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
    Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma.
    van der Schoot J; Reus NJ; Colen TP; Lemij HG
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19896194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set.
    Shirato S; Adachi M; Hara T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1991; 35(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 1770667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Glaucomatous visual field defects: their characteristics and how to detect them.
    Kitazawa Y; Yamamoto T
    Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 9292256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnosing glaucoma progression: current practice and promising technologies.
    Giangiacomo A; Garway-Heath D; Caprioli J
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 16552250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Sakata LM; DeLeĆ³n-Ortega J; Girkin CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.