BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21091127)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
    Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of hospitalization for neutropenic complications of chemotherapy in patients with primary solid tumors receiving pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Kim J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1069-81. PubMed ID: 19539108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
    Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and sargramostim prophylaxis for neutropenia-related hospitalization: two US retrospective claims analyses.
    Henk HJ; Becker L; Tan H; Yu J; Kavati A; Naeim A; Deeter R; Barron R
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 23016568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin and docetaxel/paclitaxel with colony-stimulating growth factors: a comparison of filgrastim or lenograstim with pegfilgrastim.
    Schippinger W; Holub R; Dandachi N; Bauernhofer T; Samonigg H
    Oncology; 2006; 70(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16899982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.
    Almenar D; Mayans J; Juan O; Bueno JM; Lopez JI; Frau A; Guinot M; Cerezuela P; Buscalla EG; Gasquet JA; Sanchez J
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 May; 18(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19076208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic analysis of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
    Eldar-Lissai A; Cosler LE; Culakova E; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2008; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 18380630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Granulocytic growth factors and cancer-related neutropenia: limited effects.
    Prescrire Int; 2006 Oct; 15(85):189-91. PubMed ID: 17128529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colony-stimulating factor use and impact on febrile neutropenia among patients with newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, or non-small cell lung cancer who were receiving chemotherapy.
    McCune JS; Sullivan SD; Blough DK; Clarke L; McDermott C; Malin J; Ramsey S
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jan; 32(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 22392824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neutropenia-associated outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
    Bradley AM; Deal AM; Buie LW; van Deventer H
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Dec; 32(12):1070-7. PubMed ID: 23208834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.
    Aapro MS; Bohlius J; Cameron DA; Dal Lago L; Donnelly JP; Kearney N; Lyman GH; Pettengell R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Walewski J; Weber DC; Zielinski C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):8-32. PubMed ID: 21095116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
    Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective comparison of neutropenia in children with Ewing sarcoma treated with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or pegylated G-CSF.
    Milano-Bausset E; Gaudart J; Rome A; Coze C; Gentet JC; Padovani L; Lacarelle B; André N
    Clin Ther; 2009; 31 Pt 2():2388-95. PubMed ID: 20110048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 72.