These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21091304)

  • 1. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols.
    Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford J; Rios M; Poirier MA
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jan; 37(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 19323859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Sep; 30(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25109228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: the effect of structure and task demands.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Dagenais E; de Broeck S; Morford J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1314-29. PubMed ID: 17905914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expressive and receptive performance with graphic symbol sentences by individuals who use aided communication.
    Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford JP; Smith MM; Mascolo MÈ
    Augment Altern Commun; 2022 Sep; 38(3):135-147. PubMed ID: 35726671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception and multimeaning analysis of graphic symbols for Thai picture-based communication system.
    Chompoobutr S; Potibal P; Boriboon M; Phantachat W
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Mar; 8(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 23244464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of word order in the interpretation of canonical and non-canonical graphic symbol utterances: A developmental study.
    Trudeau N; Morford JP; Sutton A
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):108-21. PubMed ID: 20497074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of context priming and task type on augmentative communication performance.
    Higginbotham DJ; Bisantz AM; Sunm M; Adams K; Yik F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 18608144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Communication is everything:" The experiences of volunteers who use AAC.
    Trembath D; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ; Togher L
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):75-86. PubMed ID: 20497071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of environmental sounds on the guessability of animated graphic symbols.
    Harmon AC; Schlosser RW; Gygi B; Shane HC; Kong YY; Book L; Macduff K; Hearn E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Dec; 30(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 25384797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC.
    Binger C; Light J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Mar; 23(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 17364486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individuals with Intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: Analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC, and loneliness experiences.
    Stancliffe RJ; Larson S; Auerbach K; Engler J; Taub S; Lakin KC
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 20497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review.
    Millar DC; Light JC; Schlosser RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):248-64. PubMed ID: 16671842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: research review and implications for effective practice.
    Binger C; Light J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2008; 24(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 18465366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 1: system description.
    Tönsing KM; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 36417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of children with typical development when reading and interpreting graphic-symbol sequences.
    Boyer C; Trudeau N; Sutton A
    Augment Altern Commun; 2012 Jun; 28(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22670727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.
    McCall F; Marková I; Murphy J; Moodie E; Collins S
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(3 Spec No):235-56. PubMed ID: 9474291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children.
    Worah S; McNaughton D; Light J; Benedek-Wood E
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015; 17(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 25592055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: efficacy of a computer-based augmentative and alternative communication intervention.
    Koul R; Corwin M; Hayes S
    Brain Lang; 2005 Jan; 92(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 15582036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Augmentative communication for the non-speaking child.
    Sheehy E; Moore K; Tsamtsouris A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 17(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 8217893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.