269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21091304)
1. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems.
Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V
Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols.
Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford J; Rios M; Poirier MA
J Child Lang; 2010 Jan; 37(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 19323859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities.
Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP
Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Sep; 30(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25109228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: the effect of structure and task demands.
Trudeau N; Sutton A; Dagenais E; de Broeck S; Morford J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1314-29. PubMed ID: 17905914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expressive and receptive performance with graphic symbol sentences by individuals who use aided communication.
Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford JP; Smith MM; Mascolo MÈ
Augment Altern Commun; 2022 Sep; 38(3):135-147. PubMed ID: 35726671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception and multimeaning analysis of graphic symbols for Thai picture-based communication system.
Chompoobutr S; Potibal P; Boriboon M; Phantachat W
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Mar; 8(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 23244464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of word order in the interpretation of canonical and non-canonical graphic symbol utterances: A developmental study.
Trudeau N; Morford JP; Sutton A
Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):108-21. PubMed ID: 20497074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of context priming and task type on augmentative communication performance.
Higginbotham DJ; Bisantz AM; Sunm M; Adams K; Yik F
Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 18608144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Communication is everything:" The experiences of volunteers who use AAC.
Trembath D; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ; Togher L
Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):75-86. PubMed ID: 20497071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of environmental sounds on the guessability of animated graphic symbols.
Harmon AC; Schlosser RW; Gygi B; Shane HC; Kong YY; Book L; Macduff K; Hearn E
Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Dec; 30(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 25384797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC.
Binger C; Light J
Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Mar; 23(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 17364486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individuals with Intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: Analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC, and loneliness experiences.
Stancliffe RJ; Larson S; Auerbach K; Engler J; Taub S; Lakin KC
Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 20497072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review.
Millar DC; Light JC; Schlosser RW
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):248-64. PubMed ID: 16671842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: research review and implications for effective practice.
Binger C; Light J
Augment Altern Commun; 2008; 24(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 18465366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 1: system description.
Tönsing KM; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 36417262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of children with typical development when reading and interpreting graphic-symbol sequences.
Boyer C; Trudeau N; Sutton A
Augment Altern Commun; 2012 Jun; 28(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22670727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.
McCall F; Marková I; Murphy J; Moodie E; Collins S
Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(3 Spec No):235-56. PubMed ID: 9474291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children.
Worah S; McNaughton D; Light J; Benedek-Wood E
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015; 17(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 25592055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: efficacy of a computer-based augmentative and alternative communication intervention.
Koul R; Corwin M; Hayes S
Brain Lang; 2005 Jan; 92(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 15582036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Augmentative communication for the non-speaking child.
Sheehy E; Moore K; Tsamtsouris A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 17(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 8217893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
