These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2109196)
1. Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients? Lo B; Rouse F; Dornbrand L N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1228-32. PubMed ID: 2109196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Between life and death lies dignity. Gasner R Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):6-11, 13-4. PubMed ID: 10113092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court to examine withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10113080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Matter of life or death. Berliner H Health Serv J; 1990 Jun; 100(5204):851. PubMed ID: 10113222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpreting the Cruzan case for Arkansas. Hackler C; Wilson AO J Ark Med Soc; 1990 Sep; 87(4):152-4. PubMed ID: 2146249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nancy Cruzan in China. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal dilemma of stopping artificial feeding. Blum JD Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 1990; 7(3):42-8. PubMed ID: 2113822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abridged brief as amicus curiae of the American Geriatrics Society. Glover JJ; Mastroianni A; Anderson KR; Lynn J J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 2110200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right-to-die ruling begs the question: who will decide? Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1990 Oct; 20(43):34-9. PubMed ID: 10113384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Need for clear and convincing evidence of a patient's wishes before artificial nutrition and hydration may be withdrawn. Brushwood DB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 47(12):2720-2. PubMed ID: 2278289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan. Karbal W J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clarifying who decides. Hollister DC Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10103559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution. Mazzeo KE Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Court's guidelines on incompetent patients compromise their rights. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 10248004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]