109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21091977)
21. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Satake N; Ohori M; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Miyakawa A; Hatano T; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 20132361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association of percent positive prostate biopsies and perineural invasion with biochemical outcome after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Wong WW; Schild SE; Vora SA; Halyard MY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Sep; 60(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15337536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Schnall M; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 7539857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of pathological stages before prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: analysis of 12 systematic prostate needle biopsy specimens.
Park EA; Lee HJ; Kim KG; Kim SH; Lee SE; Choe GY
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 17681059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
Stav K; Judith S; Merald H; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Zisman A
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 17826654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Endothelin-1 and receptor A: predictive value for biochemical relapse on patients with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer].
Rotondo S; Menard J; Durlach A; Birembaut P; Staerman F
Prog Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 22196004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium.
Chun FK; Briganti A; Gallina A; Hutterer GC; Shariat SF; Antebie E; Walz J; Roehrborn CG; Salonia A; Rigatti P; Saad F; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17383807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
