294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21092290)
1. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters.
Hadian M; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
Crit Care; 2010; 14(6):R212. PubMed ID: 21092290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.
Lamia B; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.
Mukkamala R; Kohl BA; Mahajan A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 34246222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of acute pulmonary hypertension on cardiac output measurements: calibrated pulse contour analysis, transpulmonary and pulmonary artery thermodilution against a modified Fick method in an animal model.
Kutter APN; Mosing M; Hartnack S; Raszplewicz J; Renggli M; Mauch JY; Hofer CK
Anesth Analg; 2015 Jul; 121(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 25742632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques.
Feng Y; Ye Z; Shen Y; Xiong W; Chen X; Gan X; Wen S; Yang L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):201. PubMed ID: 38844869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Lin SY; Chou AH; Tsai YF; Chang SW; Yang MW; Ting PC; Chen CY
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):807-815. PubMed ID: 29039063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and Trending Ability of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/EV1000 System in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Before and After Surgical Valve Replacement.
Eisenried A; Klarwein R; Ihmsen H; Wehrfritz A; Tandler R; Heim C; Fechner J
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 May; 33(5):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 30318421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.
Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Joseph P; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
Critchley LA
Crit Care; 2011 Jan; 15(1):106. PubMed ID: 21349140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved Performance of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System for Tracking Cardiac Output Changes.
Suehiro K; Tanaka K; Mikawa M; Uchihara Y; Matsuyama T; Matsuura T; Funao T; Yamada T; Mori T; Nishikawa K
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015; 29(3):656-62. PubMed ID: 25440654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Milam AJ; Ghoddoussi F; Lucaj J; Narreddy S; Kumar N; Reddy V; Hakim J; Krishnan SH
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(2):514-529. PubMed ID: 32622708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system.
Opdam HI; Wan L; Bellomo R
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Feb; 33(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 17063359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs.
Kutter AP; Bettschart-Wolfensberger R; Romagnoli N; Bektas RN
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2016 Jul; 26(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 26754858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation.
Krejci V; Vannucci A; Abbas A; Chapman W; Kangrga IM
Liver Transpl; 2010 Jun; 16(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 20517912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Comparison With the Intermittent Bolus Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
Kusaka Y; Ohchi F; Minami T
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Apr; 33(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 30077561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of thermodilution, lithium dilution, and pulse contour analysis for the measurement of cardiac output in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs.
Morgaz J; Granados Mdel M; Muñoz-Rascón P; Dominguez JM; Fernández-Sarmiento JA; Gómez-Villamandos RJ; Navarrete R
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2014; 24(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 25142925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.
Sangkum L; Liu GL; Yu L; Yan H; Kaye AD; Liu H
J Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):461-80. PubMed ID: 26961819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
