These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21092343)

  • 41. Likelihood ratios for DNA identification.
    Collins A; Morton NE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Jun; 91(13):6007-11. PubMed ID: 8016106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Easykin: a flexible and user-friendly online tool for forensic kinship testing and missing person identification.
    Li R; Wang N; Zang Y; Liu J; Wu E; Wu R; Sun H
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Nov; 137(6):1671-1681. PubMed ID: 37747571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Consent process for US-based family reference DNA samples.
    Katsanis SH; Snyder L; Arnholt K; Mundorff AZ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():71-79. PubMed ID: 29107870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Fulton County Medical Examiner's experience with the Federal Bureau of Investigation National Missing Person DNA Database Program, 2004-2007.
    Heninger M; Hanzlick R
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Mar; 32(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 21394958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Genetic aspects of genealogy].
    Tetushkin EIu
    Genetika; 2011 Nov; 47(11):1451-72. PubMed ID: 22332404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An approach to unified formulae for likelihood ratio calculation in pairwise kinship analysis.
    Ma G; Wang Q; Cong B; Li S
    Front Genet; 2024; 15():1226228. PubMed ID: 38384715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Familias 3 - Extensions and new functionality.
    Kling D; Tillmar AO; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():121-7. PubMed ID: 25113576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Examples of kinship analysis where Profiler Plus™ was not discriminatory enough for the identification of victims using DNA identification.
    Hartman D; Benton L; Morenos L; Beyer J; Spiden M; Stock A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):64-8. PubMed ID: 20970265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Forensic typing of short tandem repeat markers on the X and Y chromosomes.
    Diegoli TM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Sep; 18():140-51. PubMed ID: 25934544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The aunt and uncle effect: an empirical evaluation of the confounding influence of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction.
    Olsen JB; Busack C; Britt J; Bentzen P
    J Hered; 2001; 92(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 11447239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pedigree-based relationship inference from complex DNA mixtures.
    Dørum G; Kaur N; Gysi M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 May; 131(3):629-641. PubMed ID: 28101646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Population substructure can significantly affect reliability of a DNA-led process of identification of mass fatality victims.
    Kracun SK; Curić G; Birus I; Dzijan S; Lauc G
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):874-8. PubMed ID: 17567288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis.
    O'Connor KL; Tillmar AO
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):840-4. PubMed ID: 22542849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. HAPLORE: a program for haplotype reconstruction in general pedigrees without recombination.
    Zhang K; Sun F; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 15231536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of a claimed distant relationship in a deficient pedigree using high density SNP data.
    Lareu MV; García-Magariños M; Phillips C; Quintela I; Carracedo A; Salas A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 21868300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
    Egeland T; Slooten K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A family-based likelihood ratio test for general pedigree structures that allows for genotyping error and missing data.
    Yang Y; Wise CA; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Hum Hered; 2008; 66(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 18382089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A new framework to test parent-child and full sibling relationships with population substructure.
    Kooakachai M; LaBerge G; Santorico SA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Dec; 305():110012. PubMed ID: 31759292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.