These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21092343)

  • 61. Joint variant and de novo mutation identification on pedigrees from high-throughput sequencing data.
    Cleary JG; Braithwaite R; Gaastra K; Hilbush BS; Inglis S; Irvine SA; Jackson A; Littin R; Nohzadeh-Malakshah S; Rathod M; Ware D; Trigg L; De La Vega FM
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):405-19. PubMed ID: 24874280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Evaluation of parentage testing accuracy of child trafficking cases: Combining the exclusion probability and likelihood ratio approaches.
    Yu K; Fung WK
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():81-87. PubMed ID: 29428891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Beyond simple kinship and identification: aDNA analyses from a 17th-19th century crypt in Germany.
    Alterauge A; Lösch S; Sulzer A; Gysi M; Haas C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102498. PubMed ID: 33872864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A general method to assess the utility of the X-chromosomal markers in kinship testing.
    Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 21592877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. AUCP: An indicator for system effectiveness of panels in pairwise distant kinship identification.
    Ma G; Cong B; Li S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110539. PubMed ID: 33142188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Forensic aspects of mass disasters: strategic considerations for DNA-based human identification.
    Budowle B; Bieber FR; Eisenberg AJ
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2005 Jul; 7(4):230-43. PubMed ID: 15975517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Kinship analysis: assessment of related vs unrelated based on defined pedigrees.
    Turrina S; Ferrian M; Caratti S; Cosentino E; De Leo D
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 26590134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Whole-genome sequencing of human remains to enable genealogy DNA database searches - A case report.
    Tillmar A; Sjölund P; Lundqvist B; Klippmark T; Älgenäs C; Green H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102233. PubMed ID: 31981902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. PRIMUS: improving pedigree reconstruction using mitochondrial and Y haplotypes.
    Staples J; Ekunwe L; Lange E; Wilson JG; Nickerson DA; Below JE
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):596-8. PubMed ID: 26515822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Pedigree generation for analysis of genetic linkage and association.
    Bass MP; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():93-103. PubMed ID: 14992495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A standalone humanitarian DNA identification database system to increase identification of human remains of foreign nationals.
    Budowle B; Bus MM; Josserand MA; Peters DL
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):2039-2044. PubMed ID: 32767019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
    Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The strategies to DVI challenges in Typhoon Morakot.
    Lin CY; Huang TY; Shih HC; Yuan CH; Chen LJ; Tsai HS; Pan CH; Chiang HM; Liu HL; Su WC; Wu KT; Chao CH; Huang NE; Yang KD; Hsieh HM; Tsai LC; Linacre A; Yu YJ; Lin YY; Chu PC; Lee JC
    Int J Legal Med; 2011 Sep; 125(5):637-41. PubMed ID: 20552214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Composite likelihood method for inferring local pedigrees.
    Ko A; Nielsen R
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1006963. PubMed ID: 28827797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Identifying contributors of DNA mixtures by means of quantitative information of STR typing.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):887-902. PubMed ID: 21210742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Mixtures with relatives: a pedigree perspective.
    Egeland T; Dørum G; Vigeland MD; Sheehan NA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 May; 10():49-54. PubMed ID: 24572837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Considering relatives when assessing the evidential strength of mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():259-63. PubMed ID: 25259769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Next Generation Sequencing Plus (NGS+) with Y-chromosomal Markers for Forensic Pedigree Searches.
    Qian X; Hou J; Wang Z; Ye Y; Lang M; Gao T; Liu J; Hou Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11324. PubMed ID: 28900279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.