241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21094484)
1. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study.
Erkmen E; Meriç G; Kurt A; Tunç Y; Eser A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 21094484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Framework design of an anterior fiber-reinforced hybrid composite fixed partial denture: a 3D finite element study.
Yokoyama D; Shinya A; Lassila LV; Gomi H; Nakasone Y; Vallittu PK; Shinya A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 19639081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of posterior fiber reinforced composite fixed partial denture: framework design for pontic.
Shinya A; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Shinya A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 19645309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs.
Xie Q; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
J Dent; 2007 Jul; 35(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 17513033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress and strain analysis of the bone-implant interface: a comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and titanium implants utilizing 3-dimensional finite element study.
Shinya A; Ballo AM; Lassila LV; Shinya A; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():133-40. PubMed ID: 20545537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures: the influence of restorative materials and abutment design on stress distribution investigated by finite element model.
Rappelli G; Scalise L; Coccia E; Procaccini M
Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Oct; 58(10):459-70. PubMed ID: 19893471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structural optimization of the fibre-reinforced composite substructure in a three-unit dental bridge.
Shi L; Fok AS
Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):791-801. PubMed ID: 19185911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis to compare stress distribution of gold alloy, lithium-disilicate reinforced glass ceramic and zirconia based fixed partial denture.
Zheng Z; Lin J; Shinya A; Matinlinna JP; Botelho MG; Shinya A
J Investig Clin Dent; 2012 Nov; 3(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 22977016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength of fiber-reinforced surface-retained anterior cantilever restorations.
Ozcan M; Kumbuloglu O; User A
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 18548961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
