These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21094487)

  • 61. Quantifying the effect of ionic strength on colloidal fouling potential in membrane filtration.
    Singh G; Song L
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2005 Apr; 284(2):630-8. PubMed ID: 15780303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Surface charge regulation of reverse osmosis membrane for anti-silica and organic fouling.
    Wang S; Mu C; Xiao K; Zhu X; Huang X
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 715():137013. PubMed ID: 32041057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The effect of colloid stability of wastewater treatment plants effluent on nanofiltration performance.
    Schrader GA; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):345-57. PubMed ID: 16459809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Formation of polysulfone colloids for adsorption of natural organic foulants.
    Clark MM; Ahn WY; Li X; Sternisha N; Riley RL
    Langmuir; 2005 Aug; 21(16):7207-13. PubMed ID: 16042443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Fouling behavior of microstructured hollow fiber membranes in dead-end filtrations: critical flux determination and NMR imaging of particle deposition.
    Çulfaz PZ; Buetehorn S; Utiu L; Kueppers M; Bluemich B; Melin T; Wessling M; Lammertink RG
    Langmuir; 2011 Mar; 27(5):1643-52. PubMed ID: 21250739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Membrane independent limiting flux for RO and NF membranes fouled by humic acid.
    Tang CY; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jul; 41(13):4767-73. PubMed ID: 17695927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Investigation of membrane fouling by synthetic and natural particles.
    Kweon JH; Lawler DF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):279-85. PubMed ID: 15686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
    Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
    Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
    Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Characteristics of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor under sub-critical flux operation.
    Su YC; Huang CP; Pan JR; Lee HC
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 18360002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
    Ping Chu H; Li XY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Characterizing dissolved organic matter and evaluating associated nanofiltration membrane fouling.
    Her N; Amy G; Chung J; Yoon J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 17662337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters.
    Howe KJ; Clark MM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(16):3571-6. PubMed ID: 12214651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Fouling in reverse osmosis membranes: monitoring, characterization, mitigation strategies and future directions.
    Ahmed MA; Amin S; Mohamed AA
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e14908. PubMed ID: 37064488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Fouling of microfiltration membranes by organic polymer coagulants and flocculants: controlling factors and mechanisms.
    Wang S; Liu C; Li Q
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):357-65. PubMed ID: 20828779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Treatment of agricultural wastewater and reuse.
    Reimann W
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):177-82. PubMed ID: 12523751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Implications of adhesive interaction between membrane and organic matter on spontaneous osmotic backwash cleaning.
    Cai YH; Gopalakrishnan A; Deshmukh KP; Schäfer AI
    Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118752. PubMed ID: 35810632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Humic Acid fouling mitigation by antiscalant in reverse osmosis system.
    Yang Q; Liu Y; Li Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5153-8. PubMed ID: 20527757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.