127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21094961)
1. Re: Fuhrman grade provides higher prognostic accuracy than nucleolar grade for papillary renal cell carcinoma: T. Klatte, C. Anterasian, J. W. Said, M. de Martino, F. F. Kabbinavar, A. S. Belldegrun and A. J. Pantuck J Urol 2010; 183: 2143-2147.
Delahunt B; Bethwaite PB; Miller RJ; Sika-Paotonu D; Srigley JR
J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):356-7; author reply 357-8. PubMed ID: 21094961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Presence of tumor necrosis is not a significant predictor of survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: higher prognostic accuracy of extent based rather than presence/absence classification. T. Klatte, J. W. Said, M. de Martino, J. Larochelle, B. Shuch, J. Y. Rao, G. V. Thomas, F. F. Kabbinavar, A. S. Belldegrun and A. J. Pantuck. J Urol 2009; 181: 1558-1564.
Breau RH; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Kwon ED; Blute ML
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2979-80; author reply 2980-1. PubMed ID: 19846128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fuhrman grade provides higher prognostic accuracy than nucleolar grade for papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Klatte T; Anterasian C; Said JW; de Martino M; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2143-7. PubMed ID: 20399450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome.
Cornejo KM; Dong F; Zhou AG; Wu CL; Young RH; Braaten K; Sadow PM; Nielsen GP; Oliva E
Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1411-7. PubMed ID: 26297250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome.
Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Sukov WR; Thompson RH; Leibovich BC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 22367296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Location of extrarenal tumor extension does not impact survival of patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma. V. Margulis, P. Tamboli, S. F. Matin, M. Meisner, D. A. Swanson and C. G. Wood. J Urol 2007; 178: 1878-1882.
Thompson RH; Cheville JC; Leibovich BC; Blute ML
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):409; author reply 409-10. PubMed ID: 18495169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Outcomes following partial nephrectomy by tumor size P. L. Crispen, S. A. Boorjian, C. M. Lohse, T. S. Sebo, J. C. Cheville, M. L. Blute and B. C. Leibovich J Urol 2008; 180: 1912-1917.
Cimen HI; Serefoglu EC; Balbay MD
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1232; author reply 1232. PubMed ID: 19625039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nucleolus detection in the Fuhrman grading system for application in CCRC.
Kruk M; Osowski S; Markiewicz T; Kozlowski W; Koktysz R; Slodkowska J; Swiderski B
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Feb; 59(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 23945111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.
Erdoğan F; Demirel A; Polat O
Int J Clin Pract; 2004 Apr; 58(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 15161115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of extensive necrosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Collins J; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2017 Aug; 66():108-114. PubMed ID: 28669641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of simplified Fuhrman grading system in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
Hong SK; Jeong CW; Park JH; Kim HS; Kwak C; Choe G; Kim HH; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2011 Feb; 107(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 20804473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of microvascular invasion in predicting survival in renal cell carcinoma.
Santiago-Agredano B; Álvarez-Kindelán J; Font-Ugalde P; Blanca-Pedregosa A; López-Beltrán A; Requena-Tapia MJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2013 Sep; 37(8):504-12. PubMed ID: 23623182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The time for accurate Fuhrman grading of renal cell carcinomas has arrived.
True LD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Dec; 118(6):827-9. PubMed ID: 12472274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical analysis of a simplified Fuhrman grading scheme for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--Impact on prognosis.
Becker A; Hickmann D; Hansen J; Meyer C; Rink M; Schmid M; Eichelberg C; Strini K; Chromecki T; Jesche J; Regier M; Randazzo M; Tilki D; Ahyai S; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Zigeuner R; Chun FK
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26520403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
