These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21095055)

  • 61. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Srivastava A; Chopra S; Pham A; Sooriakumaran P; Durand M; Chughtai B; Gruschow S; Peyser A; Harneja N; Leung R; Lee R; Herman M; Robinson B; Shevchuk M; Tewari A
    Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 22901982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The 5-year functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a real-life experience in Korea.
    Hong SK; Doo SH; Kim DS; Lee WK; Park HZ; Park JH; Jeong SJ; Yoon CY; Byun SS; Lee SE
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Nov; 12(6):835-40. PubMed ID: 20835257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.
    Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.
    de Carvalho PA; Barbosa JABA; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Rocco B; Nahas WC; Patel V; Coelho RF
    Eur Urol; 2020 May; 77(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 30041833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-Specific Variations in Patient-Reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy From a Statewide Improvement Collaborative.
    Auffenberg GB; Qi J; Dunn RL; Linsell S; Kim T; Miller DC; Tosoian J; Sarle R; Johnston WK; Kleer E; Ghani KR; Montie J; Peabody J
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Mar; 156(3):e206359. PubMed ID: 33471043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Urinary continence and erectile function: a prospective evaluation of functional results after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Katz R; De La Taille A; Saint F; Vordos D; Cicco A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Eur Urol; 2002 Oct; 42(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 12361898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of functional outcomes between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison study.
    Ku JY; Lee CH; Lee JZ; Ha HK
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun; 13(3):212-218. PubMed ID: 27667779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.
    Vickers AJ; Bianco FJ; Serio AM; Eastham JA; Schrag D; Klein EA; Reuther AM; Kattan MW; Pontes JE; Scardino PT
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1171-7. PubMed ID: 17652279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Survival, Continence and Potency (SCP) recovery after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a long-term combined evaluation of surgical outcomes.
    Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Dababneh H; Pultrone CV; Chessa F; Concetti S; Gentile G; Vagnoni V; Romagnoli D; Della Mora L; Rizzi S; Martorana G; Brunocilla E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1716-23. PubMed ID: 25085795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome.
    Anastasiadis AG; Salomon L; Katz R; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Urology; 2003 Aug; 62(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 12893338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Association between number of prostate biopsies and patient-reported functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance protocols.
    Anderson CB; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Mulhall JP; Sandhu J; Touijer K; Laudone VP; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Ehdaie B
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6B):E46-51. PubMed ID: 26118438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Development of Nomograms to Predict the Recovery of Erectile Function Following Radical Prostatectomy.
    Mulhall JP; Kattan MW; Bennett NE; Stasi J; Nascimento B; Eastham J; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT
    J Sex Med; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1796-1802. PubMed ID: 31521569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Performance Feedback May Not Improve Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: The Surgical Report Card (SuRep) Study.
    Kumar RM; Fergusson DA; Lavallée LT; Cagiannos I; Morash C; Horrigan M; Mallick R; Stacey D; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Sands D; Breau RH
    J Urol; 2021 Aug; 206(2):346-353. PubMed ID: 33818139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Repeat prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy do not impact erectile function recovery and mid- to long-term continence.
    Furrer MA; Vilaseca A; Corradi RB; Boxler S; Thalmann GN; Nguyen DP
    Prostate; 2018 Jun; 78(8):631-636. PubMed ID: 29542169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
    Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
    Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Efficacy of modified radical prostatectomy technique for recovery of urinary incontinence in high-grade prostate cancer.
    Chung JW; Kim SW; Kang HW; Ha YS; Choi SH; Lee JN; Kim BS; Kim HT; Kim TH; Yoon GS; Kwon TG; Chung SK; Yoo ES
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):605-614. PubMed ID: 32298065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes.
    Colombo R; Naspro R; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Raber M; Suardi N; Saccà A; Rigatti P
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2459-63; discussion 2463. PubMed ID: 17085129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.