These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21095083)

  • 1. Use of prior mammograms in the transition to digital mammography: a performance and cost analysis.
    Taylor-Phillips S; Wallis MG; Duncan A; Gale AG
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 21095083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening.
    Roelofs AA; Karssemeijer N; Wedekind N; Beck C; van Woudenberg S; Snoeren PR; Hendriks JH; Rosselli del Turco M; Bjurstam N; Junkermann H; Beijerinck D; Séradour B; Evertsz CJ
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 17185661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
    Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-view versus single-view mammography at subsequent screening in a region of the Dutch breast screening programme.
    van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; den Heeten GJ; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Fracheboud J; Plaisier ML; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2189-94. PubMed ID: 21906898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes.
    Glynn CG; Farria DM; Monsees BS; Salcman JT; Wiele KN; Hildebolt CF
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):664-70. PubMed ID: 21788529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should previous mammograms be digitised in the transition to digital mammography?
    Taylor-Phillips S; Wallis MG; Gale AG
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):1890-6. PubMed ID: 19294388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
    Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.
    Posso MC; Puig T; Quintana MJ; Solà-Roca J; Bonfill X
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3262-71. PubMed ID: 26747264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Michell MJ; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Evans DR; Peacock C; Lawinski CP; Douiri A; Wilson R; Whelehan P
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Oct; 67(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 22625656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital and film mammography.
    Ebell MH
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16482675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The patient burden of screening mammography recall.
    Alcusky M; Philpotts L; Bonafede M; Clarke J; Skoufalos A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S11-9. PubMed ID: 25247382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.
    Sala M; Salas D; Belvis F; Sánchez M; Ferrer J; Ibañez J; Román R; Ferrer F; Vega A; Laso MS; Castells X
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 21273520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Patel BK; Gray RJ; Pockaj BA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):W231-W237. PubMed ID: 28379734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.