These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2109544)

  • 1. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males: a cost-based decision analysis.
    Randolph AG; Washington AE
    Am J Public Health; 1990 May; 80(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 2109544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males.
    Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moncada J; Keogh J; Pantell R; Gourlay L; Eyre S; Boyer CB
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Urinary leukocyte esterase screening test for asymptomatic chlamydial and gonococcal infections in males.
    Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moscicki AB; Weiss A; Shalwitz J; Vaughan E; Millstein SG
    JAMA; 1989 Nov; 262(18):2562-6. PubMed ID: 2509742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An economic evaluation of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males.
    Genç M; Ruusuvaara L; Mårdh PA
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2057-64. PubMed ID: 8411572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
    Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dipstick leukocyte esterase activity in first-catch urine specimens. A useful screening test for detecting sexually transmitted disease in the adolescent male.
    Sadof MD; Woods ER; Emans SJ
    JAMA; 1987 Oct; 258(14):1932-4. PubMed ID: 3656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening via internet-based self-collected swabs compared with clinic-based sample collection.
    Huang W; Gaydos CA; Barnes MR; Jett-Goheen M; Blake DR
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Sep; 38(9):815-20. PubMed ID: 21844736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.
    van Valkengoed IG; Postma MJ; Morré SA; van den Brule AJ; Meijer CJ; Bouter LM; Boeke AJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Aug; 77(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 11463928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-benefit analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in pregnant women in a high burden setting in the United States.
    Ditkowsky J; Shah KH; Hammerschlag MR; Kohlhoff S; Smith-Norowitz TA
    BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Feb; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 28214469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of a leukocyte esterase dipstick to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae urethritis in asymptomatic adolescent male detainees.
    O'Brien SF; Bell TA; Farrow JA
    Am J Public Health; 1988 Dec; 78(12):1583-4. PubMed ID: 3189639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The utility and cost of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening of a male infertility population.
    Domes T; Lo KC; Grober ED; Mullen JB; Mazzulli T; Jarvi K
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 22192351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
    Nyári T; Mészáros G; Deák J; Nagy E; Kovács L
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis by the direct fluorescent antibody test in female Navy recruits.
    Orndorff GR
    Mil Med; 1991 Dec; 156(12):675-7. PubMed ID: 1780069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating adolescents in juvenile detention facilities for urogenital chlamydial infection: costs and effectiveness of alternative interventions.
    Mrus JM; Biro FM; Huang B; Tsevat J
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Jul; 157(7):696-702. PubMed ID: 12860793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Major improvements in cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis using pooled urine specimens and high performance testing.
    Morré SA; Welte R; Postma MJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Feb; 78(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 11872874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pooling of urine specimens allows accurate and cost-effective genetic detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Lithuania and other low-resource countries.
    Butylkina R; Juseviciute V; Kasparaviciene G; Vagoras A; Pagirskas E; Unemo M; Domeika M
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2007; 39(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 17366049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.