159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21095973)
1. Validity of a new method to estimate mean arterial pressure at brachial level.
Graf S; Craiem D; Armentano RL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2861-4. PubMed ID: 21095973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].
Chemaly E; London G; Benetos A; Darné B; Asmar R
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2002; 95(7-8):637-40. PubMed ID: 12365071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulse pressure amplification, pressure waveform calibration and clinical applications.
Agnoletti D; Zhang Y; Salvi P; Borghi C; Topouchian J; Safar ME; Blacher J
Atherosclerosis; 2012 Sep; 224(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 22832004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.
Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.
Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-arterial analysis of the best calibration methods to estimate aortic blood pressure.
Picone DS; Schultz MG; Peng X; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Qasem A; Sharman JE
J Hypertens; 2019 Feb; 37(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 30234775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error.
Hansen S; Staber M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods.
Mahieu D; Kips J; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; Verbeke F; Gillebert TC; De Backer GG; De Bacquer D; Verdonck P; Van Bortel LM; Segers P;
J Hypertens; 2010 Feb; 28(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19901847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Central blood pressure estimation in type 1 diabetes: impact and implications of peripheral calibration method.
Helleputte S; Spronck B; Sharman JE; Van Bortel L; Segers P; Calders P; Lapauw B; De Backer T
J Hypertens; 2023 Jan; 41(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 36214535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Brachial artery tonometry and the Popeye phenomenon: explanation of anomalies in generating central from upper limb pressure waveforms.
Adji A; O'Rourke MF
J Hypertens; 2012 Aug; 30(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 22635139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimated aortic blood pressure based on radial artery tonometry underestimates directly measured aortic blood pressure in patients with advancing chronic kidney disease staging and increasing arterial stiffness.
Carlsen RK; Peters CD; Khatir DS; Laugesen E; Bøtker HE; Winther S; Buus NH
Kidney Int; 2016 Oct; 90(4):869-77. PubMed ID: 27401535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method.
Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial artery tonometry: moderately accurate but unpredictable technique of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement.
Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Rahmig H; Rohling R; Pasch T
Br J Anaesth; 1996 Mar; 76(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 8785142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures.
Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21850061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Central Blood Pressure Estimated by a Cuff-Based Device With Radial Tonometry.
Peng X; Schultz MG; Abhayaratna WP; Stowasser M; Sharman JE
Am J Hypertens; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1173-8. PubMed ID: 27317573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oscillometry and applanation tonometry measurements in older individuals with elevated levels of arterial stiffness.
van Dijk SC; Enneman AW; Swart KM; van Schoor NM; Uitterlinden AG; Smulders YM; van den Meiracker AH; van der Velde N; Mattace-Raso FU
Blood Press Monit; 2013 Dec; 18(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 24192847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.
Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
