150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21095986)
21. Effect of coil orientation on strength-duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.
D'Ostilio K; Goetz SM; Hannah R; Ciocca M; Chieffo R; Chen JA; Peterchev AV; Rothwell JC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):675-683. PubMed ID: 26077634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of Pulse Duration and Direction on Plasticity Induced by 5 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Correlation With Neuronal Depolarization.
Halawa I; Reichert K; Aberra AS; Sommer M; Peterchev AV; Paulus W
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():773792. PubMed ID: 34899173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. High-intensity, low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances excitability of the human corticospinal pathway.
D'Amico JM; Dongés SC; Taylor JL
J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1969-1978. PubMed ID: 32292098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A C-shaped miniaturized coil for transcranial magnetic stimulation in rodents.
Jiang W; Isenhart R; Liu CY; Song D
J Neural Eng; 2023 Mar; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36863013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.
Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Paulus W; Lang N
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1915-21. PubMed ID: 20444645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative assessment of best conventional with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human motor cortex excitability.
Zafar N; Paulus W; Sommer M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1393-9. PubMed ID: 18400556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Lefaucheur JP
Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():559-580. PubMed ID: 31277876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Davila-Pérez P; Jannati A; Fried PJ; Cudeiro Mazaira J; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroscience; 2018 Nov; 393():97-109. PubMed ID: 30300705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Design Analysis and Circuit Topology Optimization for Programmable Magnetic Neurostimulator.
Sorkhabi MM; Gingell F; Wendt K; Benjaber M; Ali K; Rogers DJ; Denison T
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():6384-6389. PubMed ID: 34892573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative study of the effects of repetitive paired transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
Fitzgerald PB; Fountain S; Hoy K; Maller J; Enticott P; Laycock R; Upton D; Daskalakis ZJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 17628691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Marked differences in the thermal characteristics of figure-of-eight shaped coils used for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Weyh T; Wendicke K; Mentschel C; Zantow H; Siebner HR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15978511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimal number of pulses as outcome measures of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Chang WH; Fried PJ; Saxena S; Jannati A; Gomes-Osman J; Kim YH; Pascual-Leone A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 127(8):2892-2897. PubMed ID: 27156431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The number of full-sine cycles per pulse influences the efficacy of multicycle transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Pechmann A; Delvendahl I; Bergmann TO; Ritter C; Hartwigsen G; Gleich B; Gattinger N; Mall V; Siebner HR
Brain Stimul; 2012 Apr; 5(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 22037129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficient Mapping of the Motor Cortex with Navigated Biphasic Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Pitkänen M; Kallioniemi E; Järnefelt G; Karhu J; Julkunen P
Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov; 31(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 29971634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulation of corticospinal excitability by targeting cortical I-waves with biphasic paired-pulses.
Kallioniemi E; Savolainen P; Järnefelt G; Koskenkorva P; Karhu J; Julkunen P
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(2):322-326. PubMed ID: 29089235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Variability of pulse width in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Osnabruegge M; Kanig C; Schoisswohl S; Litschel K; Mack W; Schecklmann M; Langguth B; Schwitzgebel F
J Neural Eng; 2024 Apr; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 38513287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Stimulus waveform influences the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Taylor JL; Loo CK
J Affect Disord; 2007 Jan; 97(1-3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16887197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Construction and Evaluation of Rodent-Specific rTMS Coils.
Tang AD; Lowe AS; Garrett AR; Woodward R; Bennett W; Canty AJ; Garry MI; Hinder MR; Summers JJ; Gersner R; Rotenberg A; Thickbroom G; Walton J; Rodger J
Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():47. PubMed ID: 27445702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.
Lorenzano C; Gilio F; Inghilleri M; Conte A; Fofi L; Manfredi M; Berardelli A
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12410333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Sommer M; Alfaro A; Rummel M; Speck S; Lang N; Tings T; Paulus W
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):838-44. PubMed ID: 16495145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
