108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21096025)
1. Improving a CAD system using bilateral information.
Tortajada M; Oliver A; Díez Y; Martí R; Vilanova JC; Freixenet J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5054-7. PubMed ID: 21096025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.
Wei J; Chan HP; Zhou C; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 21626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation and comparison of CAD system performance in clinical settings.
Bornefalk H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 15935967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study of a mammographic CAD performance dependence on the considered mammogram set.
Garcia-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Gonzalez-Velasco HM; Garcia-Manso A; Macias-Macias M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4776-9. PubMed ID: 19163784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments.
Zheng B; Swensson RG; Golla S; Hakim CM; Shah R; Wallace L; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2004 Apr; 11(4):398-406. PubMed ID: 15109012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new computer-aided detection scheme based on assessment of local bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry - a preliminary evaluation.
Kelder A; Zigel Y; Lederman D; Zheng B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():6394-7. PubMed ID: 26737756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved mammographic interpretation of masses using computer-aided diagnosis.
Leichter I; Fields S; Nirel R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Lederman R; Buchbinder S
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 10663772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided mass detection based on ipsilateral multiview mammograms.
Qian W; Song D; Lei M; Sankar R; Eikman E
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 17434066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.
Giger ML; Chan HP; Boone J
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5799-820. PubMed ID: 19175137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
