These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21096029)

  • 41. Continuous detection and decoding of dexterous finger flexions with implantable myoelectric sensors.
    Baker JJ; Scheme E; Englehart K; Hutchinson DT; Greger B
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Aug; 18(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 20378481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Classification of finger movements for the dexterous hand prosthesis control with surface electromyography.
    Al-Timemy AH; Bugmann G; Escudero J; Outram N
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2013 May; 17(3):608-18. PubMed ID: 24592463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prosthesis Control with an Implantable Multichannel Wireless Electromyography System for High-Level Amputees: A Large-Animal Study.
    Bergmeister KD; Hader M; Lewis S; Russold MF; Schiestl M; Manzano-Szalai K; Roche AD; Salminger S; Dietl H; Aszmann OC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jan; 137(1):153-162. PubMed ID: 26710019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Study on Interaction Between Temporal and Spatial Information in Classification of EMG Signals for Myoelectric Prostheses.
    Menon R; Di Caterina G; Lakany H; Petropoulakis L; Conway BA; Soraghan JJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Oct; 25(10):1832-1842. PubMed ID: 28436879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control.
    Merrill DR; Lockhart J; Troyk PR; Weir RF; Hankin DL
    Artif Organs; 2011 Mar; 35(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 21371058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using speech for mode selection in control of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses.
    Fang P; Wei Z; Geng Y; Yao F; Li G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3602-5. PubMed ID: 24110509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improved myoelectric prosthesis control using targeted reinnervation surgery: a case series.
    Miller LA; Stubblefield KA; Lipschutz RD; Lock BA; Kuiken TA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Feb; 16(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 18303805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Expanding control possibilities of myoelectric hand prostheses].
    Reischl M; Mikut R; Pylatiuk C; Schulz S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():868-70. PubMed ID: 12465328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Muscle synergies for predicting non-isometric complex hand function for commanding FES neuroprosthetic hand systems.
    Cole NM; Ajiboye AB
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(5):056018. PubMed ID: 31247614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions.
    Scheme EJ; Englehart KB; Hudgins BS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1698-705. PubMed ID: 21317073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Control of a myoelectric arm considering cooperated motion of elbow and shoulder joints.
    Kiguchi K; Hayashi Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1616-9. PubMed ID: 22254632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance performance of myoelectric control for multifunctional prosthesis?
    Pan L; Zhang D; Duan R; Zhu X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():3566-9. PubMed ID: 25570761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The comparison of electromyographic pattern classifications with active and passive electrodes.
    Chiou YH; Luh JJ; Chen SC; Lai JS; Kuo TS
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Sep; 26(7):605-10. PubMed ID: 15271288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative study of state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands.
    Segil JL; Controzzi M; Weir RF; Cipriani C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(9):1439-54. PubMed ID: 25803683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of myoelectric prosthesis control strategies and feedback level on adaptation rate for a target acquisition task.
    Shehata AW; Scheme EJ; Sensinger JW
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():200-204. PubMed ID: 28813818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Myoelectric training systems.
    Dawson MR; Carey JP; Fahimi F
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 Sep; 8(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 22026623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Several practical issues toward implementing myoelectric pattern recognition for stroke rehabilitation.
    Li Y; Chen X; Zhang X; Zhou P
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 24525007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Myoelectric signals and pattern recognition from implanted electrodes in two TMR subjects with an osseointegrated communication interface.
    Mastinu E; Branemark R; Aszmann O; Ortiz-Catalan M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5174-5177. PubMed ID: 30441505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
    Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improving the Robustness of Real-Time Myoelectric Pattern Recognition against Arm Position Changes in Transradial Amputees.
    Geng Y; Samuel OW; Wei Y; Li G
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5090454. PubMed ID: 28523276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.