111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21096115)
41. Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data.
Duan KB; Rajapakse JC; Wang H; Azuaje F
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2005 Sep; 4(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 16220686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effective gene selection method with small sample sets using gradient-based and point injection techniques.
Huang D; Chow T
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(3):467-475. PubMed ID: 17666766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Multi-category classification using an Extreme Learning Machine for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis.
Zhang R; Huang GB; Sundararajan N; Saratchandran P
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(3):485-495. PubMed ID: 17666768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Improved variance estimation of classification performance via reduction of bias caused by small sample size.
Wickenberg-Bolin U; Göransson H; Fryknäs M; Gustafsson MG; Isaksson A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():127. PubMed ID: 16533392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Kalman filtering for disease-state estimation from microarray data.
Kelemen JZ; Kertész-Farkas A; Kocsor A; Puskás LG
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3047-53. PubMed ID: 17065158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Induction of comprehensible models for gene expression datasets by subgroup discovery methodology.
Gamberger D; Lavrac N; Zelezný F; Tolar J
J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):269-84. PubMed ID: 15465480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Applications of nonlinear system identification in molecular biology.
Korenberg MJ
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():256-9. PubMed ID: 17946811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
Cawley GC; Talbot NL
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A simple yet effective data integration approach to tree-based microarray data classification.
Liu L; Li Y; Liu B; Li J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():1503-6. PubMed ID: 21096367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. An effective hybrid approach of gene selection and classification for microarray data based on clustering and particle swarm optimization.
Han F; Yang S; Guan J
Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2015; 13(2):103-21. PubMed ID: 26547970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
Niijima S; Kuhara S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Constructing the gene regulation-level representation of microarray data for cancer classification.
Wong HS; Wang HQ
J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17499026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Goodman-Kruskal coefficient and its applications in genetic diagnosis of cancer.
Jaroszewicz S; Simovici DA; Kuo WP; Ohno-Machado L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1095-102. PubMed ID: 15248526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Biomedical application of fuzzy association rules for identifying breast cancer biomarkers.
Lopez FJ; Cuadros M; Cano C; Concha A; Blanco A
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2012 Sep; 50(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 22622817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Empirical study of supervised gene screening.
Ma S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():537. PubMed ID: 17176468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Minimum number of genes for microarray feature selection.
Baralis E; Bruno G; Fiori A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5692-5. PubMed ID: 19164009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Meta-analysis of several gene lists for distinct types of cancer: a simple way to reveal common prognostic markers.
Yang X; Sun X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 8():118. PubMed ID: 17411443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detecting common gene expression patterns in multiple cancer outcome entities.
Yang X; Bentink S; Spang R
Biomed Microdevices; 2005 Sep; 7(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 16133813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Many accurate small-discriminatory feature subsets exist in microarray transcript data: biomarker discovery.
Grate LR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():97. PubMed ID: 15826317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Merging microarray data from separate breast cancer studies provides a robust prognostic test.
Xu L; Tan AC; Winslow RL; Geman D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():125. PubMed ID: 18304324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
