These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21096236)

  • 1. Improving the classification rate of labor vs. normal pregnancy contractions by using EHG multichannel recordings.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4642-5. PubMed ID: 21096236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: evidence of increased in synchronization with term.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6296-9. PubMed ID: 19963919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Myometrium electromechanical modeling for internal uterine pressure estimation by electrohysterography.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6259-62. PubMed ID: 19963667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synchronization analysis of the uterine magnetic activity during contractions.
    Ramon C; Preissl H; Murphy P; Wilson JD; Lowery C; Eswaran H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():55. PubMed ID: 16197557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decrement of uterine myometrial burst duration as a correlate to active labor: a Hilbert phase approach.
    Govindan RB; Vairavan S; Furdea A; Murphy P; Preissl H; Eswaran H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4618-21. PubMed ID: 21096231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance analysis of four nonlinearity analysis methods using a model with variable complexity and application to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 24593872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of EHG contractions at term labor by nonlinear analysis.
    Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Vargas-Garcia C; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Aljama-Corrales T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7432-5. PubMed ID: 24111463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance comparison of coupling-evaluation methods in discriminating between pregnancy and labor EHG signals.
    Diab A; Boudaoud S; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 May; 132():104308. PubMed ID: 33711558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinearity of EHG signals used to distinguish active labor from normal pregnancy contractions.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2387-90. PubMed ID: 21096805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A node-wise analysis of the uterine muscle networks for pregnancy monitoring.
    Nader N; Hassan M; Falou W; Marque C; Khalil M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():712-715. PubMed ID: 28268427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reprint of 'A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals'.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Feb; 69():254-60. PubMed ID: 26832964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG; Marossero DE; Edwards RK; Euliano TY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1983-9. PubMed ID: 17019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of phase synchronization of the two frequency components of the electrohysterogram (EHG): application to the detection of human labor.
    Terrien J; Hassan M; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():17-20. PubMed ID: 21096094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Muszynski C; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23192483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.