These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21096597)

  • 1. Analysis of image quality parameter of conventional and dental radiographic digital images.
    Mayo P; Ródenas F; Verdu G; Campayo JM; Gallardo S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3174-7. PubMed ID: 21096597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of digital mammographic equipments by phantom image quality.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Campayo JM; Villaescusa JI
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1994-6. PubMed ID: 17946081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.
    Compagnone G; Casadio Baleni M; Di Nicola E; Valentino M; Benati M; Calzolaio LF; Oberhofer N; Fabbri E; Domenichelli S; Barozzi L
    Radiol Med; 2013 Jun; 118(4):540-54. PubMed ID: 23090253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of digital image quality indexes for CIRS SP01 and CDMAM 3.4 mammographic phantoms.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Campayo JM; Villaescusa JI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():418-21. PubMed ID: 19162682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase-contrast digital tomosynthesis.
    Hammonds JC; Price RR; Donnelly EF; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2353-8. PubMed ID: 21776769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innovative radiographic system to improve the sharpness of radiographs: could a phase-shift effect contribute to improved image-quality for plain computed radiographs for general use?
    Tanaka J; Oda H; Mimura T; Honda C; Oohara H; Kawasaki H; Kondo A; Wada Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 28(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 20112099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The quality of digital mammograms. Development and use of phantoms for optimal safety].
    Schöfer H; Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Britsch S; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15747150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
    Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of quality on digital X-ray devices with 3D-capability for ENT-clinical objectives in imaging of temporal bone and paranasal sinuses].
    Knörgen M; Brandt S; Kösling S
    Rofo; 2012 Dec; 184(12):1153-60. PubMed ID: 23081736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector.
    Leblans P; Struye L; Willems P
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):117-20. PubMed ID: 10847378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnosis of in-stent restenosis using ultrahigh resolution multi-transducer computer tomography].
    Schlosser T; Ulzheimer S; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Erbel R; Schmermund A
    Herz; 2006 May; 31(3):269. PubMed ID: 16770564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results of an automatic evaluation of test images according to PAS 1054 and IEC 6220-1-2 on different types of digital mammographic units].
    Blendl C; Schreiber AC; Buhr H
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 19676013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.