These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21097407)

  • 21. [Biomechanical effects of insertion location and bone cement augmentation on fixation strength of iliac screw].
    Yu B; Li Z; Zheng Z; Zhou Z; Liang C; Li H; Han G
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(12):1455-8. PubMed ID: 21261093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of screw pullout rate on screw purchase in synthetic cancellous bone.
    Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):024501. PubMed ID: 19102576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Injectable calcium phosphate cement for augmentation around cancellous bone screws. In vivo biomechanical studies.
    Larsson S; Stadelmann VA; Arnoldi J; Behrens M; Hess B; Procter P; Murphy M; Pioletti DP
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1156-60. PubMed ID: 22386107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].
    Yu B; Zhuang X; Li Z; Zheng Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 20187455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Finite element study on the amount of injection cement during the pedicle screw augmentation.
    Yan YB; Teo EC; Qiu TX; Wu ZX; Qi W; Liu D; Lei W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22015627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bone stress when miniplates are used for orthodontic anchorage: finite element analysis.
    Huang YW; Chang CH; Wong TY; Liu JK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 22999669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of bone quality and pedicle screw design on the fixation strength during Axial Pull-out test: A 2D Axisymmetric FE study.
    Makaram H; Swaminathan R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4924-4927. PubMed ID: 34892312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pull-out strength of the suprapedicle claw construct: a biomechanical study.
    Alobaid A; Arlet V; Busato A; Steffen T
    Eur Spine J; 2005 Oct; 14(8):759-64. PubMed ID: 15830212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
    Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An approximate model for cancellous bone screw fixation.
    Brown CJ; Sinclair RA; Day A; Hess B; Procter P
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013 Apr; 16(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 22149043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of the pull-out strengths of three different screws in pedicular screw revisions: a biomechanical study].
    Esenkaya I; Denizhan Y; Kaygusuz MA; Yetmez M; Keleştemur MH
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2006; 40(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 16648682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Biomechanical Analysis of Orthopedic Screw Under Bone Remodeling].
    Long D; Ji A; Zhao Z
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 44(3):194-198. PubMed ID: 32621424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
    Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fine thread versus coarse thread. A comparison of the maximum holding power.
    Gausepohl T; Möhring R; Pennig D; Koebke J
    Injury; 2001 Dec; 32 Suppl 4():SD1-7. PubMed ID: 11812471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
    Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of bone quality on the artificial temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis.
    Hsu JT; Huang HL; Tu MG; Fuh LJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):e1-5. PubMed ID: 20451824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.