These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21097855)

  • 1. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
    Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of intervening distractors in the attentional blink.
    Brisson B; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21258908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of spatial switching in the attentional blink.
    Berthet V; Kouider S
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Mar; 15(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22379692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kanizsa-figure object completion gates selection in the attentional blink.
    Chen S; Nie QY; Müller HJ; Conci M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 30501573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor detection and suppression have a beneficial effect on attentional blink.
    Zhao J; Li H; Ding C; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44786. PubMed ID: 22984558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the blink: the importance of target-distractor similarity in eliciting an attentional blink with faces.
    Müsch K; Engel AK; Schneider TR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41257. PubMed ID: 22815982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task switching mediates direct interference of intertarget distractors in the attentional blink: An event-related potential study.
    Brisson B
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):919-32. PubMed ID: 25712465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in the attentional blink. The important role of irrelevant information.
    Martens S; Valchev N
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19261574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.
    Griffiths G; Herwig A; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 23757511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load.
    Gupta R; Hur YJ; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 26479771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM; Benito CT; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.
    Rusconi P; Huber DE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739. PubMed ID: 29030758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Bischof WF; Di Lollo V
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1418-32. PubMed ID: 15813204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The root cause of the attentional blink: first-target processing or disruption of input control?
    Lagroix HE; Spalek TM; Wyble B; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1606-22. PubMed ID: 22893006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
    Kihara K; Yagi Y; Takeda Y; Kawahara JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):168-79. PubMed ID: 20731524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data-limited manipulations of T1 difficulty modulate the attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Ohan JL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Jun; 61(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17665751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.
    Vermeulen N; Godefroid J; Mermillod M
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7924. PubMed ID: 19936235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.
    Jannati A; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 21327367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.