95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21097858)
1. Visual marking survives graphical change if meaning is retained.
Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2144-56. PubMed ID: 21097858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
Osugi T; Kawahara JI
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items.
Osugi T; Murakami I
Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.
Jiang Y; Chun MM; Marks LE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):717-30. PubMed ID: 12075898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A visual and semantic locus to beneficial effects of verbalization on face memory.
Brown C; Gehrke J; Lloyd-Jones TJ
Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(1):51-69. PubMed ID: 20377126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
Watson DG; Humphreys GW
Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semantic and affective salience: the role of meaning and preference in attentional capture and disengagement.
Biggs AT; Kreager RD; Gibson BS; Villano M; Crowell CR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 22390289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion.
Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Watson DG
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 12669757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
Osugi T; Murakami I
Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.
Olivers CN; Humphreys GW; Heinke D; Cooper AC
Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 12132757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations.
Osugi T; Murakami I
Vision Res; 2014 Feb; 95():51-60. PubMed ID: 24368220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What kind of memory supports visual marking?
Jiang Y; Wang SW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 14769069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.
Donk M; Theeuwes J
Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 11521854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
