188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21097965)
1. The ethics of research ethics committees.
Gallagher A
Nurs Ethics; 2010 Nov; 17(6):683-4. PubMed ID: 21097965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial: Should studies without ethical permission be published in JCN?
Watson R
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Mar; 15(3):251. PubMed ID: 16466472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to Editorial: Watson, R. (2006) Editorial: Should studies without ethical permission be published in JCN? Journal of Clinical Nursing 15, 251.
Holzhauser K; Winch S; Henderson A
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):837-8. PubMed ID: 18279287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.
Long T; Fallon D
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17655528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on Long T, Fallon, D (2007) Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16, 1398-1404.
Watson R
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(11):1534-5. PubMed ID: 18482151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To IRB or not to IRB: that is the question!
Chappy S; Gaberson KB
AORN J; 2012 Jun; 95(6):682-3. PubMed ID: 22633373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith.
Freshwater D
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Feb; 13(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16441386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics in neonatal pain research.
Axelin A; Salanterä S
Nurs Ethics; 2008 Jul; 15(4):492-9. PubMed ID: 18515438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
Kaktins NM
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Show us the evidence.
Seifert PC
AORN J; 2012 Jun; 95(6):680-1. PubMed ID: 22633372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
Bliss-Holtz J
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Building the science of pediatric nursing.
Foster R
J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2010 Jan; 15(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20074106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research ethics committees and conflicts of interest.
Price L
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Sep; (191):13-6. PubMed ID: 16206440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicentre drug trials, ethics approval and death of patients.
Millar JA
Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):298-9; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Kerrison S; Pollock AM
J Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 31(8):487-9. PubMed ID: 16076976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical concerns of reviewers: more issues.
Wiwanitkit V
Nurs Ethics; 2011 Nov; 18(6):862. PubMed ID: 22128100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics: Predatory Publishing: Keeping the Wolves from Your Office Door.
Merkle Sorrell J; Owens JK
Online J Issues Nurs; 2015 Aug; 20(3):9. PubMed ID: 26882518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Literature review: status and trends of research ethics in Swedish nurses' dissertations.
Kjellström S; Fridlund B
Nurs Ethics; 2010 May; 17(3):383-92. PubMed ID: 20444779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
