218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21098448)
1. Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States.
Berrington de Gonzalez A; Kim KP; Smith-Bindman R; McAreavey D
Circulation; 2010 Dec; 122(23):2403-10. PubMed ID: 21098448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.
Berrington de González A; Mahesh M; Kim KP; Bhargavan M; Lewis R; Mettler F; Land C
Arch Intern Med; 2009 Dec; 169(22):2071-7. PubMed ID: 20008689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personalized assessment of radiation risks from the one-stop-shop myocardial 256-slice CT examination.
Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Pagonidis K; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(6):5267-72. PubMed ID: 23988304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Projected cancer risks potentially related to past, current, and future practices in paediatric CT in the United Kingdom, 1990-2020.
Journy NM; Lee C; Harbron RW; McHugh K; Pearce MS; Berrington de González A
Br J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 116(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 27824812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [High radiation exposure by myocardial scintigraphy: Is there a dosage problem?].
Lindner O; Burchert W; Schäfers M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Mar; 136(12):600. PubMed ID: 21412682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis.
Rampinelli C; De Marco P; Origgi D; Maisonneuve P; Casiraghi M; Veronesi G; Spaggiari L; Bellomi M
BMJ; 2017 Feb; 356():j347. PubMed ID: 28179230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(15):1-45. PubMed ID: 23074392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis.
Berrington de González A; Kim KP; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Smith-Bindman R; Yee J; Kuntz KM; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Berg CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):816-23. PubMed ID: 21427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(16):1-167. PubMed ID: 23074467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(16):1-80. PubMed ID: 23074393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
Hendrick RE
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 20736332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state camera: simulation of a very low dose imaging protocol.
Nakazato R; Berman DS; Hayes SW; Fish M; Padgett R; Xu Y; Lemley M; Baavour R; Roth N; Slomka PJ
J Nucl Med; 2013 Mar; 54(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 23321457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender Differences in Radiation Dose From Nuclear Cardiology Studies Across the World: Findings From the INCAPS Registry.
Shi L; Dorbala S; Paez D; Shaw LJ; Zukotynski KA; Pascual TN; Karthikeyan G; Vitola JV; Better N; Bokhari N; Rehani MM; Kashyap R; Dondi M; Mercuri M; Einstein AJ;
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 9(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 27056156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noncardiac findings on dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT.
Williams KA; Hill KA; Sheridan CM
J Nucl Cardiol; 2003; 10(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 12900744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RadRAT: a radiation risk assessment tool for lifetime cancer risk projection.
Berrington de Gonzalez A; Iulian Apostoaei A; Veiga LH; Rajaraman P; Thomas BA; Owen Hoffman F; Gilbert E; Land C
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):205-22. PubMed ID: 22810503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of effective dose and lifetime risk of cancer incidence of CT attenuation correction acquisitions and radiopharmaceutical administration for myocardial perfusion imaging.
Tootell AK; Szczepura K; Hogg P
Br J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 87(1041):20140110. PubMed ID: 24998249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.
Cao CF; Ma KL; Shan H; Liu TF; Zhao SQ; Wan Y; Jun-Zhang ; Wang HQ
BMC Cancer; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1238. PubMed ID: 36451138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk.
Miglioretti DL; Johnson E; Williams A; Greenlee RT; Weinmann S; Solberg LI; Feigelson HS; Roblin D; Flynn MJ; Vanneman N; Smith-Bindman R
JAMA Pediatr; 2013 Aug; 167(8):700-7. PubMed ID: 23754213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation Dose Assessment for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Single Institution Survey.
Alkhybari E; Albeshan S; Alanazi B; Alfarraj R; Alduhaim R; El Bez Chanem I; Tulbah R
Tomography; 2023 Jan; 9(1):264-273. PubMed ID: 36828373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
