222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21098839)
1. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.
Rauch GM; Kuerer HM; Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Hobbs BP; Adrada BE; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 23774990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noncalcified ductal carcinoma in situ: imaging and histologic findings in 36 tumors.
Kim JH; Ko ES; Kim DY; Han H; Sohn JH; Choe DH
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Jul; 28(7):903-10. PubMed ID: 19546332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients.
Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Khetani K; Abdullah N; Joseph L; Kao E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 19414087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ductal carcinoma in situ that involves sclerosing adenosis: high frequency of bilateral breast cancer occurrence.
Yoshida A; Hayashi N; Akiyama F; Yamauchi H; Uruno T; Kikuchi M; Yagata H; Tsugawa K; Suzuki K; Nakamura S; Tsunoda H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Dec; 12(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 23083502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography on detecting abnormal findings of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Boonjunwetwatmd D; Chyutipraiwan U; Sampatanukul P; Chatamra K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 17427533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Easily recognizable sonographic patterns of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Chiang CL; Liang HL; Chou CP; Huang JS; Yang TL; Chou YH; Pan HB
J Chin Med Assoc; 2016 Sep; 79(9):493-9. PubMed ID: 27449723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
