These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21098924)

  • 1. Error-corrected estimation of regional kinetic parameter histograms directly from pet projections.
    Pölönen H; Niemi J; Ruotsalainen U
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7573-86. PubMed ID: 21098924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic dynamic model for estimation of rate constants and their variances from noisy and heterogeneous PET measurements.
    Niemi J; Ruotsalainen U; Saarinen A; Ruohonen K
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Feb; 69(2):585-604. PubMed ID: 16917679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
    Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional compensation for statistical maximum likelihood reconstruction error of PET image pixels.
    Forma J; Niemi JA; Ruotsalainen U
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 58(14):4849-64. PubMed ID: 23787460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a variance model for dynamic PET: uses in fitting kinetic data and optimizing the injected activity.
    Walker MD; Matthews JC; Asselin MC; Watson CC; Saleem A; Dickinson C; Charnley N; Julyan PJ; Price PM; Jones T
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6655-72. PubMed ID: 20962367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification.
    Wang G; Qi J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 19211345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
    España S; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A filtering approach based on Gaussian-powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy.
    Parodi K; Bortfeld T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):1991-2009. PubMed ID: 16585841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Scatter correction of PET based on non-linear statistical estimate method].
    Wu Z; Chen S; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15762120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of the injected activity in dynamic 3D PET: a generalized approach using patient-specific NECs as demonstrated by a series of 15O-H2O scans.
    Walker MD; Matthews JC; Asselin MC; Saleem A; Dickinson C; Charnley N; Julyan PJ; Price PM; Jones T
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1409-17. PubMed ID: 19690021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated particle filter framework for positron emission tomography image reconstruction.
    Yu F; Liu H; Hu Z; Shi P
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Apr; 29(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 22472843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of kinetic parameters without input functions: analysis of three methods for multichannel blind identification.
    Riabkov DY; Di Bella EV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1318-27. PubMed ID: 12450362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modeling method to improve quantitation of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in heterogeneous tumor tissue.
    Wu HM; Huang SC; Choi Y; Hoh CK; Hawkins RA
    J Nucl Med; 1995 Feb; 36(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 7830134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic PET imaging.
    Gao F; Liu H; Shi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 1):492-9. PubMed ID: 22003654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of inter-crystal scatter on estimation methods for random coincidences and subsequent correction.
    Torres-Espallardo I; Rafecas M; Spanoudaki V; McElroy DP; Ziegler SI
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2391-411. PubMed ID: 18421120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of local statistical noise in PET images induced by attenuation inside the body.
    Kitamura H; Inoue K; Sasaki T; Tsuda K; Fujimori H; Tanaka T; Fukushi M; Moriyama N; Fujii H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 24(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20229366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) model to address data dispersion on positron emission tomography.
    Santarelli MF; Della Latta D; Scipioni M; Positano V; Landini L
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Oct; 77():90-101. PubMed ID: 27522237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separation of input function for rapid measurement of quantitative CMRO2 and CBF in a single PET scan with a dual tracer administration method.
    Kudomi N; Watabe H; Hayashi T; Iida H
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1893-908. PubMed ID: 17374918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic imaging and tracer kinetic modeling for emission tomography using rotating detectors.
    Lau CH; Feng D; Hutton BF; Lun DP; Siu WC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Dec; 17(6):986-94. PubMed ID: 10048855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of dopamine transporters in human brain using [11C]PE2I and positron emission tomography: evaluation of reference tissue models.
    Seki C; Ito H; Ichimiya T; Arakawa R; Ikoma Y; Shidahara M; Maeda J; Takano A; Takahashi H; Kimura Y; Suzuki K; Kanno I; Suhara T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2010 May; 24(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 20364374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.