133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21099174)
1. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
Murai M; Kishimoto K; Tanaka K; Oota K; Ienaga A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect on image data resampling in evaluation of the basic imaging properties for a digital radiographic system based on a flat panel detector].
Katayama R; Sakai S; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Takada K; Hayabuchi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul; 63(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 17917336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of basic imaging properties for digital radiographic systems based on a direct conversion type of flat panel detector].
Sakai S; Katayama R; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Hayabuchi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18311020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).
Gomi T; Koshida K; Miyati T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 16763929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
Samei E
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method.
Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Ohashi K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jul; 8(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 26088943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system.
Tanaka N; Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Akasaka T; Sasaki M; Ohki M; Morishita J
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jan; 6(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 23143711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2010 Mar; 7622(76224W):76224W-76244W9. PubMed ID: 21170177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
