These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21099177)

  • 1. [Effect of signal selection in receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis].
    Takeda S; Goto M; Maruno T; Honda T; Mochidome K; Shiraishi J
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1467-73. PubMed ID: 21099177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
    Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
    Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between image information content and observer performance in digital intraoral radiography.
    Takarabe S; Okamura K; Kuramoto T; Tokumori K; Kato T; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 36289169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
    Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ROC analysis for evaluating the detectability of image unsharpness due to the patient's movement: phantom study comparing preview and diagnostic LCDs].
    Tanaka R; Shiraishi J; Takamori M; Watari C
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(7):772-8. PubMed ID: 21799278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic detection performance of a simulated nodule in chest computed tomography images and gray and color nuclear medicine images: comparison between a medical liquid crystal display monitor and an ordinary liquid crystal display monitor].
    Okumura E; Kamimae R; Miyashita K; Ueda R; Kanmae Y; Kubo M; Shirasaka N; Takeda T; Hashimoto N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Aug; 70(8):757-67. PubMed ID: 25142386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing image quality and dose reduction of a new x-ray computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm using model observers.
    Tseng HW; Fan J; Kupinski MA; Sainath P; Hsieh J
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071910. PubMed ID: 24989388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of image quality and total performance in Norwegian mammography laboratories. Findings in a national survey based on different phantoms and ROC methodology.
    Olsen JB; Skretting A; Widmark A
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Sep; 39(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 9755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quantitative evaluation of low contrast detectability in a brain computed tomography: investigation for the effect of window width on recognition of hyperacute ischemic stroke].
    Nagashima H; Iwasaki T; Sunaga S; Gokan T; Fujii M; Sato K; Negishi T; Shiraishi A; Ogura T; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1408-14. PubMed ID: 22104232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An anthropomorphic phantom for receiver operating characteristic studies in CT imaging of liver lesions.
    Olerud HM; Olsen JB; Skretting A
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):35-43. PubMed ID: 10341687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of low-contrast detectability in low-dose hepatic multidetector computed tomography using a novel adaptive filter: evaluation with a computer-simulated liver including tumors.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Miyazaki O; Nakayama Y; Goto T; Omi Y; Shimonobo T; Liu D; Yamashita Y; Hori S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jan; 41(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16355033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
    Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions.
    Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM; Lydick JT; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Nees A; Blane CE; Sahiner B
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 15895583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.