These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21099177)

  • 21. Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.
    Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16485413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
    Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between image information content and observer performance in digital intraoral radiography.
    Takarabe S; Okamura K; Kuramoto T; Tokumori K; Kato T; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 36289169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparative Study of Patient Identifications for Conventional and Portable Chest Radiographs Utilizing ROC Analysis].
    Kawashima H; Hayashi N; Ohno N; Matsuura Y; Sanada S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Aug; 71(8):663-9. PubMed ID: 26289978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of dose reduction on digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: a study of detecting simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 8686616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative Measurements Versus Receiver Operating Characteristics and Visual Grading Regression in CT Images Reconstructed with Iterative Reconstruction: A Phantom Study.
    Jensen K; Andersen HK; Smedby Ö; Østerås BH; Aarsnes A; Tingberg A; Fosse E; Martinsen AC
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):509-518. PubMed ID: 29198945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Relationship between image quality and signal detectability in CR and FPD systems].
    Kawaharada M; Ishida T; Okura Y; Kawashita I
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1449-56. PubMed ID: 21099175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Computed radiography in X-ray examination of stomach: evaluation by phantom experiments and clinical studies].
    Murakami M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 55(9):651-8. PubMed ID: 7478950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Dagenais ME; Clark BG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
    Popescu LM
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.
    Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Sayre J; Tai YC; Hoffman EJ
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 10768578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Texture analysis for automated evaluation of Jaszczak phantom SPECT system tests.
    Nichols KJ; DiFilippo FP; Palestro CJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 30418674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses.
    Yoon MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Lee ES; Ahn SJ; Han JK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22992612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.
    Franken EA; Berbaum KS; Marley SM; Smith WL; Sato Y; Kao SC; Milam SG
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):732-7. PubMed ID: 1399457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.