59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21099600)
21. Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.
Schmitt JJ; Carranza Leon DA; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; Dowdy SC; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Pasupathy KS; Gebhart JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 27926638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Non-decent Vaginal Hysterectomy in Rural Setup of MP: A Poor Acceptance.
Jain SB; Chandrakar KD
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2016 Oct; 66(Suppl 1):499-504. PubMed ID: 27651653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Corso S; Pirovano C; Trio C; Villa M; Turoli D; Youssef A
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27460843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association between Fellowship Training, Surgical Volume, and Laparoscopic Suturing Techniques among Members of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.
Mikhail E; Scott L; Miladinovic B; Imudia AN; Hart S
Minim Invasive Surg; 2016; 2016():5459147. PubMed ID: 26885389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vaginal Hysterectomy: The Present Past.
Veronikis DK
Mo Med; 2015; 112(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 26821444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Trends and Factors Influencing Inpatient Prolapse Surgical Costs and Length of Stay in the United States.
Sanses TV; Schiltz NK; Richter HE; Koroukian SM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 26571432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Open abdominal surgery: a diminishing art.
Riss P; Ralph G; Dwyer P
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1557-8. PubMed ID: 26337428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.
Andryjowicz E; Wray TB; Reinaldo Ruiz V; Rudolf J; Noroozkhani S; Crowder S; Slezak JM
Perm J; 2015; 19(4):39-45. PubMed ID: 26222092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving Patient Outcomes in Gynecology: The Role of Large Data Registries and Big Data Analytics.
Erekson EA; Iglesia CB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1124-9. PubMed ID: 26188310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Huang Y; Ananth CV; Tergas AI; Duffy C; Deutsch I; Burke WM; Hou JY; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Dec; 139(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 26177552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors associated with 30-day hospital readmission after hysterectomy.
Dessources K; Hou JY; Tergas AI; Burke WM; Ananth CV; Prendergast E; Chen L; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 125(2):461-470. PubMed ID: 25569007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.
Moen MD; Richter HE
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1161-5. PubMed ID: 25027020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy.
Vree FE; Cohen SL; Chavan N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2014; 18(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24960479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Tergas AI; Herzog TJ; Burke WM; Lewin SN; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 123(5):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 24785857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safety and tolerance of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the elderly.
George EM; Tergas AI; Ananth CV; Burke WM; Lewin SN; Prendergast E; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jul; 134(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 24768851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.
Wright JD; Hassan K; Ananth CV; Herzog TJ; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 122(6):1145-53. PubMed ID: 24201674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Tsui J; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):233-241. PubMed ID: 23969789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Failure to rescue after major gynecologic surgery.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Ojalvo L; Herzog TJ; Lewin SN; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):420.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23933221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality of care in humanitarian surgery.
Chu KM; Trelles M; Ford NP
World J Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(6):1169-72; discussion 1173-4. PubMed ID: 21487849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
