230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2110203)
21. Clinical fallout from the Supreme Court decision on Nancy Cruzan: Chernobyl or Three Mile Island?
Pearlman RA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Jan; 39(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 1898957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Cruzan: facing the inevitable.
Bopp J; Marzen TJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 1910130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cruzan and the demands of due process.
Haddad ME
Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In the Circuit Court of Jasper County, Missouri probate division at Carthage.
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):433-4. PubMed ID: 2037464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life.
Schneider CE
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):589-604. PubMed ID: 1479308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking.
Schauer F
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 1479307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The legal consensus about foregoing life-sustaining treatment: its status and its prospects.
Meisel A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):309-45. PubMed ID: 10123320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician?
White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Practicing medicine, fiduciary trust privacy, and public moral interloping after Cruzan.
Rie MA
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):647-64. PubMed ID: 1479310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan: On taking substituted judgment seriously.
Baron C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 2228593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cruzan: no rights violated.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 2228594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Beyond the Cruzan case: the U.S. Supreme Court and medical practice.
Lo B; Steinbrook R
Ann Intern Med; 1991 May; 114(10):895-901. PubMed ID: 2014952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
Emanuel EJ
Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies.
Gasner MR
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 2332578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cruzan: clear and convincing? Missouri stands alone.
Colby WH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2121666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Cruzan case.
Rouse F
Lancet; 1991 Jan; 337(8733):105-6. PubMed ID: 1670690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain.
Jennett B; Dyer C
BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
