These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Withholding nutrition and hydration from an incompetent: implications. Hogue EE Pediatr Nurs; 1990; 16(5):474-5. PubMed ID: 2120672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Nancy Cruzan dies, outlived by a debate over the right to die. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1990 Dec; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of the Cruzan case on medical practice. Pawlson LG Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):69-72. PubMed ID: 1895769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The concept of the person in the parens patriae jurisdiction over previously competent persons. Payton S J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):605-45. PubMed ID: 1479309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cruzan:A hostage to technology. Cranford RE Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 2228595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Medical decision-making and the "right to die" after Cruzan. Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):5-143. PubMed ID: 1895764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of Cruzan and Schiavo: the burden of proof, due process, and autonomy in the persistently vegetative patient. Mareiniss DP J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):233-59. PubMed ID: 16036814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Can others exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die? Ellman IM Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 2312272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Identifying appropriate decision-makers and standards for decision. Pollock SG Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):63-5. PubMed ID: 1895767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Ronzetti TA Univ Miami Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 46(1):149-204. PubMed ID: 11652668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Life, death, and the American College of Physicians: the Cruzan case. Snyder L Ann Intern Med; 1990 Jun; 112(11):802-4. PubMed ID: 2344110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Living wills and the right to die. Wallach SJ; Crabtree JP Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):461-4. PubMed ID: 2286520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Special report on patient care. Supreme Court upholds state court decision in Cruzan. Kadzielski MA; Neumann PG Health Care Law Newsl; 1990 Sep; 5(9):12-4. PubMed ID: 10113308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The moral right to a surrogate decision: the Cruzan case. Woods WD HEC Forum; 1990; 2(4):233-8; discussion 239-42. PubMed ID: 10105605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Rushton CH; Hogue EE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]