104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21102277)
1. Lordosis restoration after Smith-Petersen osteotomies and interbody strut placement: a radiographic study in cadavers.
Lee MJ; Wiater B; Bransford RJ; Bellabarba C; Chapman JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(25):E1487-91. PubMed ID: 21102277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers.
Uribe JS; Smith DA; Dakwar E; Baaj AA; Mundis GM; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Akbarnia BA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):476-85. PubMed ID: 22938554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additional sagittal correction can be obtained when using an expandable titanium interbody device in lumbar Smith-Peterson osteotomies: a biomechanical study.
Qandah NA; Klocke NF; Synkowski JJ; Chinthakunta SR; Hussain MM; Salloum KG; Marvin EA; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 25315134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does A Hinged Operating Table Facilitate Sagittal Correction in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Smith-Peterson Osteotomy? A Radiographic Analysis.
Polly DW; Holton KJ; Haselhuhn JJ; Soriano PBO; Jones KE; Sembrano JN; Martin CT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jun; 482(6):1065-1070. PubMed ID: 38038970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A central hook-rod construct for osteotomy closure: a technical note.
Watanabe K; Lenke LG; Daubs MD; Kim YW; Kim YB; Watanabe K; Stobbs G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1149-55. PubMed ID: 18449051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.
Kim YJ; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Cheh G; Baldus C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2189-97. PubMed ID: 17873810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technique of Reverse Smith Petersen Osteotomy (RSPO) in a patient with fixed lumbar hyperlordosis and negative sagittal imbalance.
Lewis SJ; Gray R; David K; Kopka M; Magana S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):E721-5. PubMed ID: 20535044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Bhatia NN; Lee KH; Bui CN; Luna M; Wahba GM; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified S1 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy.
Oyem PC; Greenberg JK; Rhoads CR; Spiessberger A
Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Jul; 37(6):252-255. PubMed ID: 38637935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Approach Selection: Multiple Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to Recreate Lumbar Lordosis Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: When, Why, How?
Chan AK; Mummaneni PV; Shaffrey CI
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2018 Jul; 29(3):341-354. PubMed ID: 29933802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in elderly patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance.
Cho KJ; Kim KT; Kim WJ; Lee SH; Jung JH; Kim YT; Park HB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1561-6. PubMed ID: 23921326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of steerable cage placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on lumbar lordosis.
Lindley TE; Viljoen SV; Dahdaleh NS
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 21(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 24207010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Smith-Petersen osteotomy versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior-posterior osteotomy types for the correction of cervical spine deformities.
Kim HJ; Piyaskulkaew C; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 25394319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
