184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21102279)
1. Lumbar interspinous spacers: a systematic review of clinical and biomechanical evidence.
Kabir SM; Gupta SR; Casey AT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(25):E1499-506. PubMed ID: 21102279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.
Hirsch C; Breque C; Ragot S; Pascal-Mousselard H; Richer JP; Scepi M; Khiami F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25736197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.
Puzzilli F; Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Panagiotopoulos K; Bolognini A; Callovini G; Agrillo U; Alfieri A
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():166-74. PubMed ID: 25064150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.
Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Fiore C; Faiola A; Puzzilli F; Callovini G; Alfieri A
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E14. PubMed ID: 26424338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness and safety of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Coflex, Wallis, and X-stop for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Mo Z; Li D; Zhang R; Chang M; Yang B; Tang S
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 172():74-81. PubMed ID: 29986199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and Aperius devices.
Fabrizi AP; Maina R; Schiabello L
Eur Spine J; 2011 May; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S20-6. PubMed ID: 21409561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mid-term follow-up and analysis of the failure cases of interspinous implants for degenerative lumbar diseases].
Sun HL; Li CD; Liu XY; Lin JR; Yi XD; Liu H; Lu HL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Oct; 43(5):690-5. PubMed ID: 22008677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Retrospective study of complication of interspinous implants for degenerative lumbar disease].
Sun HL; Li CD; Liu XY; Yi XD; Lin JR; Liu H; Lu HL; Li H; Yu ZR
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 23578425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.
Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Davis RP; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 25494323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical analysis following lumbar interspinous devices implant: where we are and where we go.
Grasso G; Giambartino F; Iacopino DG
Spinal Cord; 2014 Oct; 52(10):740-3. PubMed ID: 24912549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic interspinous process technology.
Christie SD; Song JK; Fessler RG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(16 Suppl):S73-8. PubMed ID: 16103838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Siddiqui M; Smith FW; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(12):1345-8. PubMed ID: 17515824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Verhoof OJ; Bron JL; Wapstra FH; van Royen BJ
Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 17846801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiological Changes after Interspinous Dynamic Stabilisation for Lateral Stenosis of Lumbar Spinal Canal: A Parallel Group Randomised Trial.
Mohar J; Cimerman M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2016; 83(4):263-268. PubMed ID: 28026727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Anderson PA; Tribus CB; Kitchel SH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Jun; 4(6):463-71. PubMed ID: 16776357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical and radiological results of non-fusion by static interspinous spacer].
Guzmán-Carranza JE; González-Moga A; Álvarez-Vázquez L; Huerta-Hernández G; Isáis-Gómez A; Galicia-Luna V; Anaya-Contreras VH
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55(2):156-160. PubMed ID: 28296365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]