These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21104276)

  • 1. Waves affect predator-prey interactions between fish and benthic invertebrates.
    Gabel F; Stoll S; Fischer P; Pusch MT; Garcia XF
    Oecologia; 2011 Jan; 165(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 21104276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between benthic predators and zooplanktonic prey are affected by turbulent waves.
    Robinson HE; Finelli CM; Koehl MA
    Integr Comp Biol; 2013 Nov; 53(5):810-20. PubMed ID: 23942646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life at the top: Lake ecotype influences the foraging pattern, metabolic costs and life history of an apex fish predator.
    Cruz-Font L; Shuter BJ; Blanchfield PJ; Minns CK; Rennie MD
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 May; 88(5):702-716. PubMed ID: 30712263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting invasive species impacts: a community module functional response approach reveals context dependencies.
    Paterson RA; Dick JT; Pritchard DW; Ennis M; Hatcher MJ; Dunn AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 25265905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple predator effects in an intertidal food web.
    Van Son TC; Thiel M
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16903040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrasting effects of fish predation on benthic versus emerging prey: a meta-analysis.
    Wesner JS
    Oecologia; 2016 Apr; 180(4):1205-11. PubMed ID: 26747266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zebra mussels affect benthic predator foraging success and habitat choice on soft sediments.
    Beekey MA; McCabe DJ; Marsden JE
    Oecologia; 2004 Sep; 141(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 15278426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
    Klecka J; Boukal DS
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amphipod (Gammarus minus) responses to predators and predator impact on amphipod density.
    Wooster DE
    Oecologia; 1998 Jun; 115(1-2):253-259. PubMed ID: 28308459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined effects of nocturnal exposure to artificial light and habitat complexity on fish foraging.
    Czarnecka M; Kakareko T; Jermacz Ł; Pawlak R; Kobak J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 684():14-22. PubMed ID: 31150872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unidirectional prey-predator facilitation: apparent prey enhance predators' foraging success on cryptic prey.
    Zhang Y; Richardson JS
    Biol Lett; 2007 Jun; 3(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 17426008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Habitat segregation mediates predation by the benthic fish Cottus gobio on the exotic amphipod species Gammarus roeseli.
    Kaldonski N; Lagrue C; Motreuil S; Rigaud T; Bollache L
    Naturwissenschaften; 2008 Sep; 95(9):839-44. PubMed ID: 18523749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trait-based diet selection: prey behaviour and morphology predict vulnerability to predation in reef fish communities.
    Green SJ; Côté IM
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Nov; 83(6):1451-60. PubMed ID: 24861366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temperature does not influence functional response of amphipods consuming different trematode prey.
    Born-Torrijos A; Paterson RA; van Beest GS; Schwelm J; Vyhlídalová T; Henriksen EH; Knudsen R; Kristoffersen R; Amundsen PA; Soldánová M
    Parasitol Res; 2020 Dec; 119(12):4271-4276. PubMed ID: 32845358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trait-based predation suitability offers insight into effects of changing prey communities.
    Weigel B; Bonsdorff E
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5899. PubMed ID: 30416889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes.
    Nilsson E; Olsson K; Persson A; Nyström P; Svensson G; Nilsson U
    Oecologia; 2008 Oct; 157(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 18597120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions of multiple predators with different foraging modes in an aquatic food web.
    Carey MP; Wahl DH
    Oecologia; 2010 Feb; 162(2):443-52. PubMed ID: 19777265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-down control of prey increases with drying disturbance in ponds: a consequence of non-consumptive interactions?
    Greig HS; Wissinger SA; McIntosh AR
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 May; 82(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 23402626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of resource subsidy duration in a detritus-based stream ecosystem: A mesocosm experiment.
    Sato T; Ueda R; Takimoto G
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 May; 90(5):1142-1151. PubMed ID: 33560517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Turbulence, Temperature, and Turbidity: The Ecomechanics of Predator-Prey Interactions in Fishes.
    Higham TE; Stewart WJ; Wainwright PC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2015 Jul; 55(1):6-20. PubMed ID: 25980563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.