These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21105219)

  • 1. Britain cuts back deeply on spending.
    Gross M
    Curr Biol; 2010 Nov; 20(21):R905-6. PubMed ID: 21105219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science funding may be protected in next spending review, minister says.
    O'Dowd A
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3871. PubMed ID: 26187171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An open letter to the administration on indirect costs.
    Pings CJ
    Acad Med; 1994 May; 69(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 8166915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal boost for German science.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2014 Jun; 510(7503):19. PubMed ID: 24899285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 2010 budget. Stimulus spending looms large as Obama charts a course for science.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):864-6. PubMed ID: 19443752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lifebelt for UK science.
    Rees M
    Science; 2010 Nov; 330(6005):731. PubMed ID: 21051600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. University cuts show science is far from saved.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7329):133. PubMed ID: 21228831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US science agencies dodge deep cuts.
    Semeniuk I
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7374):455-6. PubMed ID: 22113668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selling science: at what price?
    Lawler A
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5298):296-7. PubMed ID: 9005547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic instincts.
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2008 Feb; 3(2):59. PubMed ID: 18654454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UK government warned over 'catastrophic' cuts.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):420-1. PubMed ID: 20651661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decisive effort?
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6899):3. PubMed ID: 12181524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. World view: Save British science, again.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7313):269. PubMed ID: 20844513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US science faces a squeeze.
    Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Samuel Reich E
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):146-7. PubMed ID: 21068799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False alarms.
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7280):402. PubMed ID: 20110942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Budget numbers for US science looking up.
    Hand E; Wadman M
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):18. PubMed ID: 19262638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Funding shake-up urged.
    Williams N
    Curr Biol; 2003 Dec; 13(24):R939. PubMed ID: 14680643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congress busy planning health spending cuts.
    Weissenstein E; Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1995 Mar; 25(12):2, 16. PubMed ID: 10140675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. UK government lobbying for increased spending on universities intensifies.
    Birmingham K
    Nat Med; 1998 May; 4(5):539. PubMed ID: 9585210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concern about spending cuts aired at Northern Ireland dinner.
    Vet Rec; 2010 Dec; 167(23):883-4. PubMed ID: 21262663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.