BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2110640)

  • 21. Performance appraisal.
    Clark MD
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Oct; 13(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 6924150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Utilize developmental evaluation encourage employee improvement.
    Jones MK; Johnson RP
    Hosp Top; 1979; 57(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 761913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of peer performance-evaluation on job satisfaction.
    Milewski R; McKercher PL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jul; 40(7):1202-5. PubMed ID: 6881160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Policy capturing as an approach to understanding and improving performance appraisal: a review of the literature.
    Hobson CJ; Gibson FW
    Acad Manage Rev; 1983 Oct; 8(4):640-9. PubMed ID: 10299277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A performance appraisal tool for nurse practitioners.
    Levitt MK; Stern NB; Becker KL; Zaiken H; Hangasky S; Wilcox PM
    Nurse Pract; 1985 Aug; 10(8):28-9, 32-3. PubMed ID: 4047527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
    Yager E
    Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Establishing an effective employee evaluation.
    Ulrich DJ
    Dent Assist (Waco Tx); 1985 Feb; 4(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 3855721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using workload analysis and acuity systems to facilitate quality and productivity.
    Kirk R
    J Nurs Adm; 1990 Mar; 20(3):21-30. PubMed ID: 2313371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Work evaluations: are they effective?
    Loraine K
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Apr; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 6922444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performing the performance review.
    Hayes JL
    Exec Housekeeper; 1978 Mar; 25(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 10306542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 5 steps to a performance evaluation system.
    Capko J
    Fam Pract Manag; 2003 Mar; 10(3):43-8. PubMed ID: 12685162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developing valid employee appraisal systems.
    Thompson K; Wesley AM
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Apr; 13(4):5-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10246700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
    Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Personnel management: an overdue review.
    Smith J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1982 Apr; 92(4794):529-31. PubMed ID: 10255524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. One approach to quantifying the CNS role.
    Brieger G; Smith DF; Muenchau T
    Nurs Manage; 1989 Nov; 20(11):80I-80J, 80N, 80P passim. PubMed ID: 2812624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Making performance appraisals perform: the use of team evaluation.
    Edwards MR; Sproull JR
    Personnel; 1985 Mar; 62(3):28-32. PubMed ID: 10270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance evaluation in a medical environment.
    Harrison RL
    Med Group Manage; 1978; 25(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 10238843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.