340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21106681)
1. Category-specific interference of object recognition with biological motion perception.
Wittinghofer K; de Lussanet MH; Lappe M
J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):16. PubMed ID: 21106681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys.
Vangeneugden J; Vancleef K; Jaeggli T; VanGool L; Vogels R
J Vis; 2009 Apr; 10(4):22.1-19. PubMed ID: 20465320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of orientation jitter and motion on contour saliency and object identification.
Nygård GE; Looy TV; Wagemans J
Vision Res; 2009 Oct; 49(20):2475-84. PubMed ID: 19665470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disorganizing biological motion.
Hunt AR; Halper F
J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):12.1-5. PubMed ID: 18831648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local-to-global form interference in biological motion perception.
Wittinghofer K; de Lussanet MH; Lappe M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):730-8. PubMed ID: 22231604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotation direction affects object recognition.
Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1717-30. PubMed ID: 15136006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals.
Chang DH; Troje NF
J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 18842074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic visual information facilitates object recognition from novel viewpoints.
Teramoto W; Riecke BE
J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):11. PubMed ID: 21075836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception.
Thurman SM; Grossman ED
J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):28.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis.
Lange J; Georg K; Lappe M
J Vis; 2006 Jul; 6(8):836-49. PubMed ID: 16895462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural processing in biological motion perception.
Lu H
J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):13. PubMed ID: 21047745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of limited-lifetime biological motion from different viewpoints.
Kuhlmann S; de Lussanet MH; Lappe M
J Vis; 2009 Sep; 9(10):11.1-14. PubMed ID: 19810792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex.
Vinberg J; Grill-Spector K
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1380-93. PubMed ID: 18171705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decomposing the spatiotemporal signature in dynamic 3D object recognition.
Wang Y; Zhang K
J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):23. PubMed ID: 20884488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Behavioral effects of visual field location on processing motion- and luminance-defined form.
McMullen PA; MacSween LE; Collin CA
J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 19761315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depth perception from point-light biological motion displays.
de Lussanet MH; Lappe M
J Vis; 2012 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 23090612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand.
Mayer KM; Vuong QC
Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amblyopic perception of biological motion.
Thompson B; Troje NF; Hansen BC; Hess RF
J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):22.1-14. PubMed ID: 18484861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition.
Lawson R
Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(3):293-314. PubMed ID: 21864466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas.
Lorteije JA; Kenemans JL; Jellema T; van der Lubbe RH; de Heer F; van Wezel RJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):158-68. PubMed ID: 16494678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
