These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21107241)

  • 1. Experiences of faculty and students using an audience response system in the classroom.
    Thomas CM; Monturo C; Conroy K
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jul; 29(7):396-400. PubMed ID: 21107241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring student response systems in nursing education.
    Zurmehly J; Leadingham C
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(5):265-70; quiz 271-2. PubMed ID: 18769181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Faculty experiences with providing online courses. Thorns among the roses.
    Cravener PA
    Comput Nurs; 1999; 17(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 9988966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms.
    Revell SM; McCurry MK
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 May; 49(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 20055325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students.
    Porter AG; Tousman S
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Sep; 49(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 20509583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classroom performance system use in an accelerated graduate nursing program.
    Grimes C; Joiner Rogers G; Volker D; Ramberg E
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2010; 28(2):79-85; quiz 86-7. PubMed ID: 20182157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementing Web-based instruction in a school of nursing: implications for faculty and students.
    Halstead JA; Coudret NA
    J Prof Nurs; 2000; 16(5):273-81. PubMed ID: 11033937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness, challenges, and perceptions of classroom participation systems.
    Smith DA; Rosenkoetter MM
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(4):156-61. PubMed ID: 19574851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nursing students' perception of a Web-based intervention to support learning.
    Koch J; Andrew S; Salamonson Y; Everett B; Davidson PM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 20045583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing the virtual reality learning environment: Second Life.
    Schmidt B; Stewart S
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 19574850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulated experiences: nursing students share their perspectives.
    Baxter P; Akhtar-Danesh N; Valaitis R; Stanyon W; Sproul S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2009 Nov; 29(8):859-66. PubMed ID: 19500886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cutting edge technology to enhance nursing classroom instruction at Coppin State University.
    Black CD; Watties-Daniels AD
    ABNF J; 2006; 17(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 16948362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.
    Berry J
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2009; 30(5):295-8. PubMed ID: 19824239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An interactive web-based learning unit to facilitate and improve intrapartum nursing care of nursing students.
    Gerdprasert S; Pruksacheva T; Panijpan B; Ruenwongsa P
    Nurse Educ Today; 2011 Jul; 31(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 21078535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of online course discussions. Faculty facilitation of active student learning.
    VandeVusse L; Hanson L
    Comput Nurs; 2000; 18(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 10939187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Livening up the classroom: using audience response systems to promote active learning.
    Collins LJ
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2007; 26(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17210552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system.
    Holmes RG; Blalock JS; Parker MH; Haywood VB
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Dec; 70(12):1355-61. PubMed ID: 17170327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
    Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Engaging students through the use of classroom response systems.
    Moredich C; Moore E
    Nurse Educ; 2007; 32(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 17496504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual reality simulation: using three-dimensional technology to teach nursing students.
    Jenson CE; Forsyth DM
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jun; 30(6):312-8; quiz 319-20. PubMed ID: 22411409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.