1778 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21109216)
21. In vivo termini amino acid labeling for quantitative proteomics.
Nie AY; Zhang L; Yan GQ; Yao J; Zhang Y; Lu HJ; Yang PY; He FC
Anal Chem; 2011 Aug; 83(15):6026-33. PubMed ID: 21692469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Proteomics methods for subcellular proteome analysis.
Drissi R; Dubois ML; Boisvert FM
FEBS J; 2013 Nov; 280(22):5626-34. PubMed ID: 24034475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improved reporter ion assignment of raw isobaric stable isotope labeled liquid chromatography/matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem time-of-flight mass spectral data for quantitative proteomics.
Jakoby T; Tholey A; van den Berg BH
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Dec; 26(23):2777-85. PubMed ID: 23124669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative proteome analysis using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry.
Shiio Y; Aebersold R
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17406225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An off-line high pH reversed-phase fractionation and nano-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for global proteomic profiling of cell lines.
Wang H; Sun S; Zhang Y; Chen S; Liu P; Liu B
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2015 Jan; 974():90-5. PubMed ID: 25463202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Proteome digestion specificity analysis for rational design of extended bottom-up and middle-down proteomics experiments.
Laskay ÜA; Lobas AA; Srzentić K; Gorshkov MV; Tsybin YO
J Proteome Res; 2013 Dec; 12(12):5558-69. PubMed ID: 24171472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Novel Differential Ion Mobility Device Expands the Depth of Proteome Coverage and the Sensitivity of Multiplex Proteomic Measurements.
Pfammatter S; Bonneil E; McManus FP; Prasad S; Bailey DJ; Belford M; Dunyach JJ; Thibault P
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2018 Oct; 17(10):2051-2067. PubMed ID: 30007914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A peptide-retrieval strategy enables significant improvement of quantitative performance without compromising confidence of identification.
Tu C; Shen S; Sheng Q; Shyr Y; Qu J
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 152():276-282. PubMed ID: 27903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. GeLCMS for in-depth protein characterization and advanced analysis of proteomes.
Lundby A; Olsen JV
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():143-55. PubMed ID: 21604121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags.
Aggarwal K; Choe LH; Lee KH
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2006 Jun; 5(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 16772272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proteomics: bases for protein complexity understanding.
Rotilio D; Della Corte A; D'Imperio M; Coletta W; Marcone S; Silvestri C; Giordano L; Di Michele M; Donati MB
Thromb Res; 2012 Mar; 129(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 22283976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Simultaneous quantification of protein phosphorylation sites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics: a linear algebra approach for isobaric phosphopeptides.
Xu F; Yang T; Sheng Y; Zhong T; Yang M; Chen Y
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5452-60. PubMed ID: 25403019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of a quantitative cysteinyl-peptide enrichment technology for high-throughput quantitative proteomics.
Liu T; Qian WJ; Camp DG; Smith RD
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 359():107-24. PubMed ID: 17484113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative evaluation of label-free SINQ normalized spectral index quantitation in the central proteomics facilities pipeline.
Trudgian DC; Ridlova G; Fischer R; Mackeen MM; Ternette N; Acuto O; Kessler BM; Thomas B
Proteomics; 2011 Jul; 11(14):2790-7. PubMed ID: 21656681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. KYSS: mass spectrometry data quality assessment for protein analysis and large-scale proteomics.
Such-Sanmartín G; Sidoli S; Ventura-Espejo E; Jensen ON
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Mar; 445(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 24480439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of different multidimensional LC-MS/MS pipelines for isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomic analysis of potato tubers in response to cold storage.
Yang Y; Qiang X; Owsiany K; Zhang S; Thannhauser TW; Li L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Oct; 10(10):4647-60. PubMed ID: 21842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Absolute quantitation of protein posttranslational modification isoform.
Yang Z; Li N
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():105-19. PubMed ID: 25930697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding the role of proteolytic digestion on discovery and targeted proteomic measurements using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and design of experiments.
Loziuk PL; Wang J; Li Q; Sederoff RR; Chiang VL; Muddiman DC
J Proteome Res; 2013 Dec; 12(12):5820-9. PubMed ID: 24144163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF.
Wu WW; Wang G; Baek SJ; Shen RF
J Proteome Res; 2006 Mar; 5(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 16512681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
