These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21109545)

  • 1. Complex interchanges as a complex function of chromosome organisation.
    Eidelman YA; Andreev SG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):202-6. PubMed ID: 21109545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of dose response for radiation induced exchange aberrations taking cell cycle delays into account.
    Eidelman YA; Ritter S; Nasonova E; Lee R; Talyzina TA; Andreev SG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):185-7. PubMed ID: 17132676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational model of dose response for low-LET-induced complex chromosomal aberrations.
    Eidelman YA; Andreev SG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Sep; 166(1-4):80-5. PubMed ID: 25897145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mechanistic modelling allows to assess pathways of DNA lesion interactions underlying chromosome aberration formation].
    Eĭdel'man IuA; Slanina SV; Sal'nikov IV; Andreev SG
    Genetika; 2012 Dec; 48(12):1427-36. PubMed ID: 23516904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Structural chromosome organisation and radiation-induced interchromosomal aberrations].
    Andreev SG; Eĭdel'man IuA; Talyzina TA
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2006; 46(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16579538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer simulation of data on chromosome aberrations produced by X rays or alpha particles and detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Chen AM; Lucas JN; Simpson PJ; Griffin CS; Savage JR; Brenner DJ; Hlatky LR; Sachs RK
    Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S93-101. PubMed ID: 9355862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of track structure on the understanding of relative biological effectiveness for induction of chromosomal exchanges in human lymphocytes.
    Moiseenko VV; Edwards AA; Nikjoo H; Prestwich WV
    Radiat Res; 1997 Feb; 147(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 9008213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of radiation quality on the spectrum of induced chromosome exchange aberrations.
    Boei JJ; Vermeulen S; Mullenders LH; Natarajan AT
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Aug; 77(8):847-57. PubMed ID: 11571018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Track structure based modelling of chromosome aberrations after photon and alpha-particle irradiation.
    Friedland W; Kundrát P
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):213-23. PubMed ID: 23811166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Models of chromosome aberration induction: an example based on radiation track structure.
    Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):149-56. PubMed ID: 15162029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased complexity of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations consistent with a mechanism of sequential formation.
    Anderson RM; Papworth DG; Stevens DL; Sumption ND; Goodhead DT
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2006; 112(1-2):35-44. PubMed ID: 16276088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell type-specific quantitative predictions of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations: a computer model approach.
    Kreth G; Pazhanisamy SK; Hausmann M; Cremer C
    Radiat Res; 2007 May; 167(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 17474788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interphase chromosome positioning affects the spectrum of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations.
    Boei JJ; Fomina J; Darroudi F; Nagelkerke NJ; Mullenders LH
    Radiat Res; 2006 Aug; 166(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 16881732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose response relationships for chromosome aberrations induced by low doses of alpha-particle radiation.
    Tawn EJ; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Aug; 135(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 19622542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biophysical modeling of dose response for γ-ray induced complex chromosomal aberrations].
    Eĭdel'man IuA; Slanina SV; Andreev SG
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2014; 54(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 25764815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose-response prediction for radiation-induced chromosomal instability.
    Andreev SG; Eidelman YA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):270-3. PubMed ID: 21183543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose response of gamma rays and iron nuclei for induction of chromosomal aberrations in normal and repair-deficient cell lines.
    George KA; Hada M; Jackson LJ; Elliott T; Kawata T; Pluth JM; Cucinotta FA
    Radiat Res; 2009 Jun; 171(6):752-63. PubMed ID: 19580482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanistic modelling of genetic and epigenetic events in radiation carcinogenesis.
    Andreev SG; Eidelman YA; Salnikov IV; Khvostunov IK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17164280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-color painting reveals an excess of radiation-induced dicentrics involving homologous chromosomes.
    Plan Y; Hlatky L; Hahnfeldt P; Sachs R; Loucas B; Cornforth M
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 Aug; 81(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 16298942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential radiation effects in smokers--culture time dependence of the yield of gamma ray-induced chromosome damage in first division metaphases.
    Krishnaja AP; Sharma NK
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 May; 82(5):363-77. PubMed ID: 16782654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.