BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21109731)

  • 1. Breakthrough febrile neutropenia and associated complications in Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving pegfilgrastim.
    Ng JH; Ang XY; Tan SH; Tao M; Lim ST; Chan A
    Acta Haematol; 2011; 125(3):107-14. PubMed ID: 21109731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of hospitalization for neutropenic complications of chemotherapy in patients with primary solid tumors receiving pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Kim J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1069-81. PubMed ID: 19539108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of daily filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia in Asian lymphoma patients.
    Chan A; Leng XZ; Chiang JY; Tao M; Quek R; Tay K; Lim ST
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Mar; 7(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 21332654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from an integrated analysis.
    Pettengell R; Schwenkglenks M; Bacon P; Lawrinson S; Duehrsen U
    Hematol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 29(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 21246591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
    Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of primary prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia within community practices in the US.
    Hershman D; Hurley D; Wong M; Morrison VA; Malin JL
    J Med Econ; 2009 Sep; 12(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19723018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
    Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Skarlos DV; Timotheadou E; Galani E; Samantas E; Grimani I; Lianos E; Aravantinos G; Xanthakis I; Pentheroudakis G; Pectasides D; Fountzilas G
    Oncology; 2009; 77(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19622901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pegfilgrastim use during chemotherapy: current and future applications.
    Wolf T; Densmore JJ
    Curr Hematol Rep; 2004 Nov; 3(6):419-23. PubMed ID: 15496275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: clinical and economic benefits.
    Rader M
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Apr; 20(5 Suppl 4):16-21. PubMed ID: 16736984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis.
    von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Skacel T; Lyman GH; Pousa AL; Bacon P; Easton V; Aapro MS
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(4):608-17. PubMed ID: 19110415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy benefit from first-cycle pegfilgrastim.
    Balducci L; Al-Halawani H; Charu V; Tam J; Shahin S; Dreiling L; Ershler WB
    Oncologist; 2007 Dec; 12(12):1416-24. PubMed ID: 18165618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neutropenic complications in advanced-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: implications for the use of prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).
    Bobey N; Woodman RC
    Clin Invest Med; 1998 Apr; 21(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 9562926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim after chemotherapy for lymphoma.
    Vose JM; Crump M; Lazarus H; Emmanouilides C; Schenkein D; Moore J; Frankel S; Flinn I; Lovelace W; Hackett J; Liang BC
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Feb; 21(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 12560443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.