178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21109783)
1. A risky business.
Hancocks S
Br Dent J; 2010 Nov; 209(10):483. PubMed ID: 21109783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk does exist.
Pankhurst CL
Br Dent J; 2010 Nov; 209(10):485-6. PubMed ID: 21109784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbiological contamination of dental unit water lines.
Nickel J
J Okla Dent Assoc; 1995; 86(2):52-4. PubMed ID: 9526245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Backflow prevention and the dental unit.
Dent Assist; 1996; 65(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 9525126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental unit waterlines: is this one of dentistry's compelling problems?
Christensen RP; Ploeger BJ; Hein DK
Dent Today; 1998 Jan; 17(1):80-2, 84-7. PubMed ID: 9560595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-infection in dentistry: an appraisal of the control guidelines with regard to contamination of dental unit water systems.
Fong PG
Singapore Dent J; 1993 Jun; 18(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 9582687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Check your dental unit water IQ.
Bednarsh HS; Eklund KJ; Mills S
Dent Assist; 1996; 65(6):9-10, 18, 20-1 contd. PubMed ID: 9525121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The dental waterline controversy.
Kono G
Dent Today; 1996 Aug; 15(8):82-5. PubMed ID: 9567796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Waterborne biofilms and dentistry: the changing face of infection control.
Barbeau J
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 66(10):539-41. PubMed ID: 12584771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elimination of contaminants in waterlines may be guesswork, but several options help.
Miller C
RDH; 1996 May; 16(5):36-38. PubMed ID: 9442650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Back flow' in low-volume suction lines may lead to potential cross-contamination.
Miller C
RDH; 1996 Jan; 16(1):30. PubMed ID: 9442744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Backflow prevention: an update.
Verhagen CM
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996; 78(6):18, 20. PubMed ID: 9520643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofilms. An introduction.
Beierle JW
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2001 May; 29(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 11400540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Oral pathogens in DUWL's: risk of infection and strategies for their control.
Ruiz N; Vinuesa T
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2006 Mar; 47(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 17672204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hand care and waterlines: update for the dental profession.
Myers R
Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):132-6. PubMed ID: 15559466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of exposure to Legionella in dental practice.
Szymanska J
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2004; 11(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15236492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental unit waterlines: taking the high road ... now.
Kono G
Dent Today; 1997 Aug; 16(8):32, 34, 36-41. PubMed ID: 9558496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biofilm and dental unit waterlines.
Szymanska J
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2003; 10(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 14677905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental unit water contamination.
Molinari JA
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 11692342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrically enhanced biofilm removal in a contaminated model dental unit waterline.
Wirthlin MR; Gasper C; Hoover CI
J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 2011; 59(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 21678761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
