These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21110393)

  • 1. Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: the effect of expert evidence and judicial directions.
    Goodman-Delahunty J; Cossins A; O'Brien K
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):769-83. PubMed ID: 21110393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
    Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Greater Knowledge Enhances Complainant Credibility and Increases Jury Convictions for Child Sexual Assault.
    Goodman-Delahunty J; Martschuk N; Lee E; Cossins A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():624331. PubMed ID: 34489772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An archival analysis of actual cases of historic child sexual abuse: A comparison of jury and bench trials.
    Read JD; Connolly DA; Welsh A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):259-85. PubMed ID: 16786401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
    Call AA; Wingrove T
    J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Gender on Perceptions of Credibility in Child Sexual Assault Cases: A Systematic Review.
    Voogt A; Klettke B
    J Child Sex Abus; 2017; 26(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 28350262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.
    Carter LM; Goodmon LB; Urs M; Rutledge-Jukes H
    J Homosex; 2023 May; 70(6):1187-1224. PubMed ID: 35171085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Childhood sexual assault victims: long-term outcomes after testifying in criminal court.
    Quas JA; Goodman GS; Ghetti S; Alexander KW; Edelstein R; Redlich AD; Cordon IM; Jones DP
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2005; 70(2):vii, 1-128. PubMed ID: 16159360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial.
    Golding JM; Fryman HM; Marsil DF; Yozwiak JA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1311-21. PubMed ID: 14637304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
    Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case.
    McCauley MR; Parker JF
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Apr; 25(4):523-39. PubMed ID: 11370724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of child sexual abuse:victim and perpetrator characteristics, treatment efficacy, and lay vs. legal opinions of abuse.
    Reynolds LL; Birkimer JC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2002; 11(1):53-74. PubMed ID: 16221633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
    Miller QC; Call AA; London K
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Stewart TL; Yozwiak JA; Djadali Y; Sanchez RP
    Child Maltreat; 2000 Nov; 5(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 11232265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of Victim Resistance and Type of Assault on Legal Decision-Making in Child Sexual Assault.
    Rawn KP; Levi MM; Pals AM; Huber H; Golding JM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2023 May; 32(4):418-437. PubMed ID: 36809071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of evidence-based expert testimony on perceptions of child sexual abuse involving recantation.
    Denne E; Stolzenberg SN; Neal TMS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0254961. PubMed ID: 34351935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse.
    Morison S; Greene E
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(4):595-613. PubMed ID: 1393722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of prior knowledge and expert statement on belief in recovered memories: an international perspective.
    Nachson I; Read JD; Seelau SM; Goodyear-Smith F; Lobb B; Davies G; Glicksohn J; Lifschitz M; Brimacombe E
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(3):224-36. PubMed ID: 17434587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual abuse allegations by children with neuropsychiatric disorders.
    Lindblad F; Lainpelto K
    J Child Sex Abus; 2011 Mar; 20(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 21442532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in child sexual abuse cases involving child versus adolescent complainants.
    Giroux ME; Chong K; Coburn PI; Connolly DA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2018 May; 79():224-233. PubMed ID: 29482109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.