These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21110507)

  • 1. Surgical outcome of coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound after a 2.4 mm versus 3.2 mm clear corneal temporal incision.
    Kocabora MS; Gocmez E; Taskapili M; Kocabora A; Cekic O
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2010; (315):25-30. PubMed ID: 21110507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.
    Wang Y; Xia Y; Liu X; Zheng D; Luo L; Liu Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 20163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of coaxial phacoemulsification with 2.2- and 2.8-mm clear corneal incisions.
    Sethi HS; Saluja K; Naik MP
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 28144795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of three incision size-dependent phacoemulsification systems.
    Luo L; Lin H; He M; Congdon N; Yang Y; Liu Y
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):831-839.e2. PubMed ID: 22310081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chen C; Zhu M; Sun Y; Qu X; Xu X
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 25363858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
    Dosso AA; Cottet L; Burgener ND; Di Nardo S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery.
    Park YG; Chung SH; Joo CK
    Ophthalmologica; 2012; 227(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21832823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of early distance visual acuity in patients after coaxial phacoemulsification through the micro-incision (1.8 mm) and after standard phacoemulsification through the small incision (2.75 mm).
    Orczykowska M; Owidzkaz M; Synder A; Wilczyński M; Omulecki W
    Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 25137913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of macular thickness and inflammatory cytokine levels after microincision versus small incision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Hwang HS; Ahn YJ; Lee HJ; Kim MS; Kim EC
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e189-94. PubMed ID: 25828946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Elkady B; Piñero D; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 19251139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism: temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions.
    Borasio E; Mehta JS; Maurino V
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 16698473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Analysis of One-Handed and Two-Handed Coaxial Phacoemulsification with 2.4-mm Clear Corneal Incision.
    Li P; Wu J; Guan Y; Lu Z; Xue Y; Ji M; Guan H
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Mar; 44(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 30373403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.