124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21110541)
1. Role of spectral and temporal cues in restoring missing speech information.
Gilbert G; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):EL294-9. PubMed ID: 21110541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Thresholds of the minimal perceptible differences in coupled sounds and speech intelligibility in hard of hearing schoolchildren].
Moroz BS; Sachenko SV
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (3):35-9. PubMed ID: 7385523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions.
Ardoint M; Agus T; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21. PubMed ID: 21877769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
Benard MR; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.
Shafiro V; Sheft S; Risley R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):455-65. PubMed ID: 26827039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
Rajan R; Cainer KE
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
Başkent D; Chatterjee M
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.
Apoux F; Youngdahl CL; Yoho SE; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1469-80. PubMed ID: 26428784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of temporal fine structure information for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.
Santurette S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):282-92. PubMed ID: 21303009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children.
Bertoncini J; Serniclaes W; Lorenzi C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):682-95. PubMed ID: 18952853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
